Relationship intelligence
Connections to finance.
What is the relationship, how mature is it, and what does it actually mean for the system and native token?
Selected canonical relationship scopes; not an exhaustive partnership or institution register. Stage is categorical maturity, not a positive token signal. Navigation aliases retain exact participating entity scopes.
Explore visual connections → · Curated institutional relationships, evidence and native-token implications.
Choose a system to browse the same underlying relationships. Counts do not establish significance.
Choose a participating entity scope to browse the same underlying relationships. Counts do not establish significance.
Browse selected relationship scopes. No significance ranking.
Ripple Payments / Bitso / ODL liquidity exchangesXRPXRP bridge liquidity / cross-border paymentsLive productionToken implication → inspect limitshard XRP utility with poor current quantitative transparency.XRP-PAYMENTS-ODL-BITSO-01 · expand to understand
Ripple Payments / Bitso / ODL liquidity exchanges
network / infrastructure use · Payments & money
XRP · scope-specific stage: Live production
XRP bridge liquidity / cross-border payments
Canonical participating scope: Ripple Payments; Bitso; ODL liquidity exchanges
ODL uses XRP as bridge currency; historical disclosures show billions of dollars of Ripple external XRP purchases and XRP sales; current Ripple-hosted Bitso evidence names both XRP and RLUSD in Ripple Payments.
- System implication
- direct production payments use exists.
- Public-token implication
- hard XRP utility with poor current quantitative transparency.
- What is not proven
- current 2026 XRP-routed volume/share, current sourcing mix or persistent net XRP scarcity.
Tier A · historical–2026 · Active
Ripple frozen report
Verify XRP-PAYMENTS-ODL-BITSO-01Bitso / Kraken / Coinbase International / BinanceXRPindependent derivatives/margin collateralLive productionToken implication → inspect limitsgenuine capital-efficiency use; existing-owner use is not new demand.XRP-INDEPENDENT-COLLATERAL-01 · expand to understand
Bitso / Kraken / Coinbase International / Binance
access / distribution · Credit & collateral
XRP · scope-specific stage: Live production
independent derivatives/margin collateral
Canonical participating scope: Bitso; Kraken; Coinbase International; Binance
multiple independent venues accept XRP as collateral under published haircut/collateral ratios.
- System implication
- XRP collateral utility extends beyond Ripple.
- Public-token implication
- genuine capital-efficiency use; existing-owner use is not new demand.
- What is not proven
- aggregate encumbered XRP or fresh acquisition caused by collateral eligibility.
Tier A · 2026 · Active
Ripple frozen report
Verify XRP-INDEPENDENT-COLLATERAL-01Bitso / Ripple / MXNBXRPU.S.–Mexico enterprise stablecoin settlementScheduled / committed deploymentToken implication → inspect limitscan complement or bypass XRP.XRP-BITSO-MXNB-01 · expand to understand
Bitso / Ripple / MXNB
financial product / asset deployment · Payments & money
XRP · scope-specific stage: Scheduled / committed deployment
U.S.–Mexico enterprise stablecoin settlement
Canonical participating scope: Bitso; Ripple; MXNB
MXNB was announced for XRPL and Ripple's evolving Payments-on-DEX architecture with RLUSD.
- System implication
- major prospective payment/DEX test.
- Public-token implication
- can complement or bypass XRP.
- What is not proven
- production routing, volume or XRP auto-bridge share.
Tier B · June 2026 · Monitoring
Ledger v4; Ripple frozen report
Verify XRP-BITSO-MXNB-01DBS / Franklin Templeton / RippleXRPtokenized fund ↔ RLUSD trading and future collateral/repoScheduled / committed deploymentToken implication → inspect limitsdemonstrates material XRPL adoption can bypass XRP.XRP-DBS-FRANKLIN-RLUSD-BYPASS-01 · expand to understand
DBS / Franklin Templeton / Ripple
bypass / negative control · Credit & collateral
XRP · scope-specific stage: Scheduled / committed deployment
tokenized fund ↔ RLUSD trading and future collateral/repo
Canonical participating scope: DBS; Franklin Templeton; Ripple
planned institutional architecture pairs a tokenized fund on XRPL directly with RLUSD and contemplates later collateral/repo usage.
- System implication
- strong XRPL institutional pathway.
- Public-token implication
- demonstrates material XRPL adoption can bypass XRP.
- What is not proven
- XRP principal role.
Tier B · 2026 · Active
Ripple frozen report
Verify XRP-DBS-FRANKLIN-RLUSD-BYPASS-01CoinbaseMORPHOembedded crypto-backed borrowing / lendingLive scaled productionToken implication → inspect limitsnone mandatory.MORPHO-COINBASE-01 · expand to understand
Coinbase
financial product / asset deployment · Credit & collateral
MORPHO · scope-specific stage: Live scaled production
embedded crypto-backed borrowing / lending
Canonical participating scope: Coinbase
Coinbase embeds Morpho beneath its customer interface for onchain borrowing/lending.
- System implication
- hard proof of invisible-backend model.
- Public-token implication
- none mandatory.
- What is not proven
- exclusivity or direct MORPHO-token economics.
Tier A · 2025–2026 · Active
Ledger v4; Morpho frozen report; Coinbase
Verify MORPHO-COINBASE-01RobinhoodMORPHOembedded Earn / lender distributionLive scaled productionToken implication → inspect limitsnone mandatory.MORPHO-EMBEDDED-01 · expand to understand
Robinhood
access / distribution · Credit & collateral
MORPHO · scope-specific stage: Live scaled production
embedded Earn / lender distribution
Canonical participating scope: Robinhood
Robinhood selected Morpho as underlying credit infrastructure for Earn using USDG vaults/markets.
- System implication
- mainstream distribution proof.
- Public-token implication
- none mandatory.
- What is not proven
- organic persistence without incentives or that Robinhood users drive borrower demand.
Tier A · 2026 · Active
Ledger v4; Morpho frozen report
Verify MORPHO-EMBEDDED-01Circle Mint / Morpho / AaveMORPHOBTC/cirBTC-backed USDC borrowing through embedded third-party lending marketsLive productionToken implication → inspect limitsno mandatory MORPHO demand; multi-protocol abstraction reinforces the possibility that distributor growth can route among competing credit backends.MORPHO-CIRCLE-MINT-DABB-01 · expand to understand
Circle Mint / Morpho / Aave
financial product / asset deployment · Credit & collateral
MORPHO · scope-specific stage: Live production
BTC/cirBTC-backed USDC borrowing through embedded third-party lending markets
Canonical participating scope: Circle Mint; Morpho; Aave
Circle Mint launched Digital Asset-Backed Borrowing with Morpho as the first supported third-party lending protocol on Arc/Ethereum; on 6 October Circle and Aave Labs confirmed that Aave markets are now also supported inside the same institutional Circle Mint workflow.
- System implication
- preserves strong institutional validation for Morpho while converting the previously anticipated multi-protocol risk into demonstrated competitive routing inside the same distribution channel.
- Public-token implication
- no mandatory MORPHO demand; multi-protocol abstraction reinforces the possibility that distributor growth can route among competing credit backends.
- What is not proven
- Circle Mint borrowing balances or protocol-level flow split between Morpho and Aave, continued Morpho share, exclusivity, or any MORPHO-token economic requirement.
Tier A · 21 September–6 October 2026 · Active
Ledger v4; Morpho frozen report; Circle DABB launch 21 Sep. 2026; Circle and Aave Labs official channel confirmations 6 Oct. 2026
Verify MORPHO-CIRCLE-MINT-DABB-01Figure / Sentora PRIMEMORPHOhome-equity / real-world credit financingLive scaled productionDated research classification; exact source and measurement limits apply below.Token implication → inspect limitsno mandatory MORPHO capture.MORPHO-FIGURE-PRIME-01 · expand to understand
Figure / Sentora PRIME
financial product / asset deployment · Credit & collateral
MORPHO · scope-specific stage: Live scaled production
home-equity / real-world credit financing
Canonical participating scope: Figure / Sentora PRIME
Figure-linked PRIME credit was used in Morpho markets with roughly $159M borrowed and high utilization at the frozen snapshot.
Dated research scope / source limitation · September 2026 The production Figure PRIME/Morpho collateral pathway is independently documented. Approximately $159M borrowed and high utilization are the frozen September24 research observation, not verified current market balances. The live exact market page is not an archived measurement. Neither deployment nor borrowing establishes MORPHO-holder capture. Canonical Stage, Tier and Lifecycle are research classifications retained from the accepted Ledger; this notice is not new source verification.
- System implication
- direct bridge to real U.S. household credit.
- Public-token implication
- no mandatory MORPHO capture.
- What is not proven
- that future Figure auto/SMB/mortgage products automatically become Morpho volume.
Tier A · September 2026 · Active
Morpho frozen report
Verify MORPHO-FIGURE-PRIME-01Snapshot qualification: roughly $159M borrowed is the September frozen-research observation, not a current live balance. Morpho’s official story and the exact PRIME/PYUSD market support the operating collateral pathway. Direct source link pending verification for the historical borrowed/utilization input: the changing market page is not an archived September snapshot. Future Figure products and MORPHO-holder capture are not established.
Apollo / MorphoMORPHOMORPHO acquisition right + strategic relationshipScheduled / committed deploymentToken implication → inspect limitsreal acquisition pathway and some supported actual acquisition.MORPHO-APOLLO-TOKEN-RIGHTS-01 · expand to understand
Apollo / Morpho
access / distribution · Capital & market access
MORPHO · scope-specific stage: Scheduled / committed deployment
MORPHO acquisition right + strategic relationship
Canonical participating scope: Apollo / Morpho
Apollo/affiliates may acquire up to 90M MORPHO over 48 months; Apollo Funds separately participated in the $175M token-purchase financing.
- System implication
- multi-layer institutional relationship.
- Public-token implication
- real acquisition pathway and some supported actual acquisition.
- What is not proven
- Apollo acquired 90M, exact current holdings or systematic open-market buying.
Tier A · 2026 · Corrected
Ledger v4; Morpho frozen report
Verify MORPHO-APOLLO-TOKEN-RIGHTS-01Ripple Prime / Trade.xyz / Virtu Financial / Talos / FalconX / Anchorage Digital / BitGo / CopperHYPEinstitutional access/cross-margining and RWA swap products referencing Hyperliquid HIP-3 liquidityLive productionToken implication → inspect limitsHIP-3 productive HYPE deployment and protocol fee/Assistance Fund rules remain real existing capture engines, but no new attributable HYPE purchase volume can be calculated from the Ripple announcement.HYPE-INSTITUTIONAL-ROUTING-01 · expand to understand
Ripple Prime / Trade.xyz / Virtu Financial / Talos / FalconX / Anchorage Digital / BitGo / Copper
access / distribution · Access & infrastructure
Scope is the canonical Evidence Record; collective provider evidence does not establish provider-specific activity.
HYPE · scope-specific stage: Live production
institutional access/cross-margining and RWA swap products referencing Hyperliquid HIP-3 liquidity
Canonical participating scope: Ripple Prime; Trade.xyz; Virtu Financial; Talos; FalconX; Anchorage Digital; BitGo; Copper
Institutional routing, custody and staking access providers already serve Hyperliquid. Ripple Prime launched RWA swap access with named Virtu trading and more than 100 reference markets, linked economically to Trade.xyz futures listed on Hyperliquid and supporting RLUSD collateral through Ripple Prime.
- System implication
- strong named institutional market-access and live derivatives product evidence; maintains separation between prime brokerage and the underlying protocol.
- Public-token implication
- HIP-3 productive HYPE deployment and protocol fee/Assistance Fund rules remain real existing capture engines, but no new attributable HYPE purchase volume can be calculated from the Ripple announcement.
- What is not proven
- that every Prime customer swap routes one-for-one to a Hyperliquid exchange trade, Virtu-specific OI/volume, RLUSD onchain collateral balance, incremental HIP-3 fee share allocated to the Assistance Fund or corresponding HYPE buybacks.
Tier A · 2026–15 October 2026 · Active
Ripple 15 Oct. 2026 — https://ripple.com/ripple-press/ripple-launches-support-for-institutions-to-access-real-world-asset-perpetual-swaps/ ; Hyperliquid published HIP-3 documentation and HYPE frozen report
Verify HYPE-INSTITUTIONAL-ROUTING-01Payward / Bitnomial Exchange / Bitnomial Clearinghouse / NinjaTrader ClearingHYPEregulated U.S. onchain perpetual-futures backendScheduled / committed deploymentToken implication → inspect limitsfuture HIP-3 operating demand and fee capture if launched.HYPE-PAYWARD-US-PERPS-01 · expand to understand
Payward / Bitnomial Exchange / Bitnomial Clearinghouse / NinjaTrader Clearing
network / infrastructure use · Access & infrastructure
HYPE · scope-specific stage: Scheduled / committed deployment
regulated U.S. onchain perpetual-futures backend
Canonical participating scope: Payward; Bitnomial Exchange; Bitnomial Clearinghouse; NinjaTrader Clearing
Payward announced an architecture using Hyperliquid HIP-3/public order-book infrastructure for U.S. regulated perpetuals.
- System implication
- major potential conversion from venue to backend infrastructure.
- Public-token implication
- future HIP-3 operating demand and fee capture if launched.
- What is not proven
- regulatory approval, live deployment or production volume.
Tier B · 16 September 2026 · Monitoring
Ledger v4; HYPE frozen report
Verify HYPE-PAYWARD-US-PERPS-01Circle / Coinbase / HyperliquidHYPEaligned USDC quote-asset infrastructureLive productionToken implication → inspect limitsHYPE operating-stake demand is real.HYPE-AQAV2-ALIGNMENT-01 · expand to understand
Circle / Coinbase / Hyperliquid
network / infrastructure use · Access & infrastructure
HYPE · scope-specific stage: Live production
aligned USDC quote-asset infrastructure
Canonical participating scope: Circle; Coinbase; Hyperliquid
Circle and Coinbase hold technical/treasury deployer roles in aligned USDC infrastructure and stake required HYPE.
- System implication
- strengthens USDC/financial-rail alignment.
- Public-token implication
- HYPE operating-stake demand is real.
- What is not proven
- realized AQAv2 revenue at the frozen cutoff.
Tier A · 2026 · Active
Ledger v4; HYPE frozen report
Verify HYPE-AQAV2-ALIGNMENT-01Hyperion DeFi / HyperLend / Aviya Finance / Anchorage Digital BankHYPEpermissioned institutional credit secured by natively staked HYPE in qualified custodyLive productionToken implication → inspect limitsdirect productive HYPE collateral utility and potential holding-duration/working-inventory demand, but not proof of fresh marginal HYPE buying.HYPE-AVIYA-ANCHORAGE-CREDIT-01 · expand to understand
Hyperion DeFi / HyperLend / Aviya Finance / Anchorage Digital Bank
financial product / asset deployment · Credit & collateral
HYPE · scope-specific stage: Live production
permissioned institutional credit secured by natively staked HYPE in qualified custody
Canonical participating scope: Hyperion DeFi; HyperLend / Aviya Finance; Anchorage Digital Bank
Hyperion disclosed that a first $1M USDC institutional credit deal was completed in July 2026 against natively staked HYPE held at Anchorage Digital; on 30 September the parties formally launched Aviya's permissioned institutional credit facility on HyperLend/HyperEVM, using Anchorage Digital Bank qualified custody and Atlas settlement/collateral infrastructure while allowing HYPE to remain natively staked.
- System implication
- advances Hyperliquid's credit layer from general onchain borrowing into institutionally structured, qualified-custody collateral finance.
- Public-token implication
- direct productive HYPE collateral utility and potential holding-duration/working-inventory demand, but not proof of fresh marginal HYPE buying.
- What is not proven
- current aggregate facility size, drawn balance beyond the disclosed first deal, broad institutional borrower count, incremental open-market HYPE acquisition caused by the collateral requirement, or durable credit demand at scale.
Tier A · July–30 September 2026 · Active
Hyperion DeFi Q2 results, 12 Aug. 2026 — https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2026/08/12/3344043/0/en/hyperion-defi-reports-2q-2026-financial-results-with-another-record-quarterly-net-income-and-strong-operating-momentum.html ; facility launch, 30 Sep. 2026 — https://rss.globenewswire.com/news-release/2026/09/30/3371944/0/en/hyperion-defi-anchorage-digital-and-hyperlend-together-announce-the-first-institutional-credit-facility-on-hyperliquid.html
Verify HYPE-AVIYA-ANCHORAGE-CREDIT-01J.P. Morgan Asset ManagementETHTokenized money-market fundLive productionToken implication → inspect limitsDirect execution creates ETH gas demand, but fund AUM does not create proportional token demand.ETH-JPMAM-JLTXX-01 · expand to understand
J.P. Morgan Asset Management
financial product / asset deployment · Tokenized assets
ETH · scope-specific stage: Live production
Tokenized money-market fund
Canonical participating scope: J.P. Morgan Asset Management
J.P. Morgan Asset Management launched funded public-Ethereum JLTXX fund tokens; an SEC prospectus supplement dated 1 Oct. 2026 makes approved/allowlisted investor token-class addresses on Solana available as well as Ethereum. The legal shareholder register is maintained traditionally by the fund transfer agent.
- System implication
- Hard Ethereum production remains, with later legally operative Solana availability; do not continue an Ethereum-only issuance characterization.
- Public-token implication
- Direct execution creates ETH gas demand, but fund AUM does not create proportional token demand.
- What is not proven
- Exclusive Ethereum use; chain allocation of JLTXX AUM; Solana-funded balances or investor transfers; multichain interoperability; or proportional ETH demand.
Tier A · through 1 October 2026 (Ethereum historical production; Solana expanded legal availability) · Active
Original Ethereum authority; SEC 1 Oct. supplement — https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1659326/000119312526410016/d172947d497k.htm ; cross-reference SOL-JPMAM-JLTXX-01
Verify ETH-JPMAM-JLTXX-01BlackRock / SecuritizeETHTokenized funds and onchain share classesLive scaled productionToken implication → inspect limitsSupports proxy and gas demand but does not mechanically convert fund AUM into ETH ownership.ETH-BLACKROCK-TOKENIZED-FUNDS-01 · expand to understand
BlackRock / Securitize
financial product / asset deployment · Tokenized assets
ETH · scope-specific stage: Live scaled production
Tokenized funds and onchain share classes
Canonical participating scope: BlackRock / Securitize
Ethereum hosts meaningful live BlackRock/Securitize tokenized-fund capital, and BlackRock launched Ethereum-specific onchain share classes in 2026.
- System implication
- Strong validation of Ethereum's public institutional asset layer.
- Public-token implication
- Supports proxy and gas demand but does not mechanically convert fund AUM into ETH ownership.
- What is not proven
- BlackRock's tokenized-fund strategy is multichain; Ethereum is not guaranteed exclusive issuance.
Tier A · through 25 September 2026 · Active
S11; controlling Ethereum frozen report
Verify ETH-BLACKROCK-TOKENIZED-FUNDS-01UBSETHInstitutional tokenized fund subscription/redemptionLive productionToken implication → inspect limitsCreates real gas use but no proportional AUM-to-ETH mechanism.ETH-UBS-UMINT-01 · expand to understand
UBS
financial product / asset deployment · Tokenized assets
ETH · scope-specific stage: Live production
Institutional tokenized fund subscription/redemption
Canonical participating scope: UBS
UBS uMINT provides production evidence for Ethereum-based institutional fund subscription/redemption workflows.
- System implication
- Strong direct institutional Mainnet production.
- Public-token implication
- Creates real gas use but no proportional AUM-to-ETH mechanism.
- What is not proven
- UBS-wide tokenization activity should not be attributed entirely to Ethereum Mainnet.
Tier A · through 25 September 2026 · Active
S14; controlling Ethereum frozen report
Verify ETH-UBS-UMINT-01DTCCETHFMI tokenization infrastructureNegative controlToken implication → inspect limitsPrivate EVM usage can bypass ETH entirely.ETH-DTCC-NONMAINNET-01 · expand to understand
DTCC
bypass / negative control · Tokenized assets
ETH · scope-specific stage: Negative control
FMI tokenization infrastructure
Canonical participating scope: DTCC
DTCC's current production architecture does not establish Ethereum Mainnet as a selected Tokenization Service rail. Ethereum-compatible Besu technology appears in private/controlled architecture.
- System implication
- Ethereum is not the universal institutional settlement rail.
- Public-token implication
- Private EVM usage can bypass ETH entirely.
- What is not proven
- EVM compatibility is not public Ethereum Mainnet selection.
Tier A · through 25 September 2026 · Active
S16; controlling Ethereum frozen report
Verify ETH-DTCC-NONMAINNET-01BlackRock, Grayscale, Fidelity and regulated product ecosystemETHRegulated ETH ownership with staking economicsLive productionToken implication → inspect limitsReduces the opportunity cost historically associated with regulated ETH ownership.ETH-REGULATED-STAKING-01 · expand to understand
BlackRock, Grayscale, Fidelity and regulated product ecosystem
access / distribution · Capital & market access
ETH · scope-specific stage: Live production
Regulated ETH ownership with staking economics
Canonical participating scope: BlackRock, Grayscale, Fidelity and regulated product ecosystem
Regulated ETH structures increasingly incorporate staking economics.
- System implication
- Deepens integration with traditional investment infrastructure.
- Public-token implication
- Reduces the opportunity cost historically associated with regulated ETH ownership.
- What is not proven
- Staking-enabled wrappers guarantee sustained net inflows.
Tier A · through 25 September 2026 · Active
S31, S32, S33; controlling Ethereum frozen report
Verify ETH-REGULATED-STAKING-01SharpLinkETHCapital-market-funded ETH treasury acquisitionLive productionToken implication → inspect limitsHard evidence of externally funded ETH acquisition.ETH-SHARPLINK-01 · expand to understand
SharpLink
access / distribution · Capital & market access
ETH · scope-specific stage: Live production
Capital-market-funded ETH treasury acquisition
Canonical participating scope: SharpLink
SharpLink disclosed a direct transmission path from securities/equity financing to corporate cash and then ETH acquisition.
- System implication
- Demonstrates direct traditional-capital-market integration with ETH ownership.
- Public-token implication
- Hard evidence of externally funded ETH acquisition.
- What is not proven
- This financing model remains attractive or sustainable through all market conditions.
Tier A · through 25 September 2026 · Active
S35; controlling Ethereum frozen report
Verify ETH-SHARPLINK-01DTCC / BNP Paribas / Société Générale / participating firmsCCproduction tokenized securities, collateral, repo, securities lending, DvP and CCP-margin workflowsLive productionToken implication → inspect limitsstill conditional.CAN-DTCC-01 · expand to understand
DTCC / BNP Paribas / Société Générale / participating firms
network / infrastructure use · Credit & collateral
CC · scope-specific stage: Live production
production tokenized securities, collateral, repo, securities lending, DvP and CCP-margin workflows
Canonical participating scope: DTCC; BNP Paribas; Société Générale; participating firms
more than 30 firms participated in real production workflows; later evidence explicitly attributed multiple July transactions to Canton, including BNP Paribas and a ~$10M SG collateral movement.
- System implication
- hard FMI production evidence.
- Public-token implication
- still conditional.
- What is not proven
- recurring production scale, public-GS fee attribution, CC burn or external CC acquisition from these workflows.
Tier A · July–September 2026 · Active
Ledger v4; Canton frozen report; DTCC
Verify CAN-DTCC-01Tradeweb / Franklin Templeton / Virtu / Société Générale / Digital Asset / BlockdaemonCCtokenized U.S. Treasury versus USDCx atomic settlementLive productionToken implication → inspect limitsunproven beyond possible paid traffic.CAN-TRADEWEB-01 · expand to understand
Tradeweb / Franklin Templeton / Virtu / Société Générale / Digital Asset / Blockdaemon
network / infrastructure use · Payments & money
CC · scope-specific stage: Live production
tokenized U.S. Treasury versus USDCx atomic settlement
Canonical participating scope: Tradeweb; Franklin Templeton; Virtu; Société Générale; Digital Asset; Blockdaemon
a real-time tokenized Treasury-versus-USDCx transaction completed using Canton synchronized settlement.
- System implication
- assets + cash settlement proof.
- Public-token implication
- unproven beyond possible paid traffic.
- What is not proven
- repeat volume or attributable CC economics.
Tier A · 2026 · Active
Ledger v4; Canton frozen report
Verify CAN-TRADEWEB-01Virtu / M1X / TradewebCCinstitutional repo using sovereign digital bond collateralLive productionToken implication → inspect limitsconditional.CAN-M1X-TRADEWEB-VIRTU-REPO-01 · expand to understand
Virtu / M1X / Tradeweb
network / infrastructure use · Credit & collateral
CC · scope-specific stage: Live production
institutional repo using sovereign digital bond collateral
Canonical participating scope: Virtu; M1X; Tradeweb
bilateral repo completed atomically onchain in under 10 minutes without prime-broker intermediation.
- System implication
- strong repo/collateral production proof.
- Public-token implication
- conditional.
- What is not proven
- notional, public-GS payer path or CC burn.
Tier A · 27 August 2026 · Active
Ledger v4; Canton frozen report
Verify CAN-M1X-TRADEWEB-VIRTU-REPO-01HQLA-x / Broadridge / Digital AssetCCcollateral mobilityScheduled / committed deploymentToken implication → inspect limitsfuture conditional.CAN-HQLA-X-COLLATERAL-01 · expand to understand
HQLA-x / Broadridge / Digital Asset
network / infrastructure use · Credit & collateral
CC · scope-specific stage: Scheduled / committed deployment
collateral mobility
Canonical participating scope: HQLA-x; Broadridge; Digital Asset
HQLA-x migration/support work aligns with Canton collateral mobility.
- System implication
- high-value recurring-collateral pathway.
- Public-token implication
- future conditional.
- What is not proven
- completed scaled migration or paid-GS economics.
Tier B · legacy / forward · Monitoring
Ledger v4; Canton frozen report
Verify CAN-HQLA-X-COLLATERAL-01TreasurySpringCCnative Fixed-Term Fund issuance / ownership registerScheduled / committed deploymentToken implication → inspect limitsfuture conditional.CAN-TREASURYSPRING-FTF-01 · expand to understand
TreasurySpring
financial product / asset deployment · Tokenized assets
CC · scope-specific stage: Scheduled / committed deployment
native Fixed-Term Fund issuance / ownership register
Canonical participating scope: TreasurySpring
Canton approved a milestone-based production program with explicit issuance/ownership thresholds.
- System implication
- unusually measurable commercialization path.
- Public-token implication
- future conditional.
- What is not proven
- those future thresholds have been achieved.
Tier B · 9 September 2026 · Monitoring
Ledger v4; Canton frozen report
Verify CAN-TREASURYSPRING-FTF-01Greywick Digital / Litecoin FoundationCCreserve-backed Litecoin representation for institutional trading / yield / settlement on CantonPilot / PoCToken implication → inspect limitsnone at present beyond future conditional public-GS traffic.CAN-CLTC-GREYWICK-01 · expand to understand
Greywick Digital / Litecoin Foundation
network / infrastructure use · Payments & money
CC · scope-specific stage: Pilot / PoC
reserve-backed Litecoin representation for institutional trading / yield / settlement on Canton
Canonical participating scope: Greywick Digital; Litecoin Foundation
Greywick Digital and the Litecoin Foundation signed an MoU for cLTC, and the Foundation publicly endorsed Greywick's plan to bring Litecoin onto Canton. Testnet work is underway, with cLTC intended for institutional trading, yield-bearing and other institutional-grade uses.
- System implication
- modest but credible expansion of Canton's potential collateral/liquidity asset set; significance rises materially only if cLTC becomes funded and reused inside institutional Canton markets.
- Public-token implication
- none at present beyond future conditional public-GS traffic.
- What is not proven
- mainnet launch, funded cLTC balances, recurring trading/collateral volume, use of the public Global Synchronizer, paid-GS traffic, CC burn or externally sourced CC acquisition.
Tier B · 1 October 2026 · Monitoring
Litecoin Foundation public endorsement 1 Oct. 2026; CantonNews 1 Oct. 2026 — https://cantonnews.org/greywick-plans-litecoin-on-canton-with-cltc ; Greywick release syndicated by TechBullion — https://techbullion.com/greywick-digital-to-deploy-cltc-on-canton-network/
Verify CAN-CLTC-GREYWICK-01UK Finance / Barclays / HSBC UK / Lloyds / Monzo / NatWest / Nationwide / Santander / QuantQNTtokenized sterling deposits / programmable paymentsLive productionToken implication → inspect limitsno current mechanical upgrade without Fusion/QNT proof.QNT-GBTD-01 · expand to understand
UK Finance / Barclays / HSBC UK / Lloyds / Monzo / NatWest / Nationwide / Santander / Quant
network / infrastructure use · Payments & money
QNT · scope-specific stage: Live production
tokenized sterling deposits / programmable payments
Canonical participating scope: UK Finance; Barclays; HSBC UK; Lloyds; Monzo; NatWest; Nationwide; Santander; Quant
UK Finance confirmed two live remortgage completions and a live consumer marketplace payment using tokenized sterling deposits on shared industry infrastructure developed by Quant.
- System implication
- major upgrade from partnership/pilot evidence into live regulated-bank production.
- Public-token implication
- no current mechanical upgrade without Fusion/QNT proof.
- What is not proven
- recurring production scale, transaction values, Fusion execution, QNT gas/staking or Quant revenue.
Tier A · 24 September 2026 · Active
Ledger v4; Quant frozen report; UK Finance
Verify QNT-GBTD-01The Clearing House / QuantQNTU.S. tokenized commercial-bank deposits / clearing and settlementScheduled / committed deploymentToken implication → inspect limitsno current capture proof.QNT-TCH-ONCHAIN-MONEY-01 · expand to understand
The Clearing House / Quant
network / infrastructure use · Payments & money
QNT · scope-specific stage: Scheduled / committed deployment
U.S. tokenized commercial-bank deposits / clearing and settlement
Canonical participating scope: The Clearing House / Quant
TCH selected Quant to provide interoperability, orchestration and transaction management for its On-Chain Money Initiative with connectivity to RTP and CHIPS.
- System implication
- major U.S. bank-infrastructure path.
- Public-token implication
- no current capture proof.
- What is not proven
- production transactions, participant count, Quant economics, Fusion use, QNT gas/staking/lockup or applicability of TCH's existing >$2T/day legacy-network volumes to the new initiative.
Tier B · 24 September 2026 · Monitoring
Ledger v4; Quant frozen report
Verify QNT-TCH-ONCHAIN-MONEY-01Murex / MX.3QNTcapital-markets integration / tokenized deposits / digital-bond settlementLive productionToken implication → inspect limitscurrent relationship primarily supports company/infrastructure thesis.QNT-MUREX-01 · expand to understand
Murex / MX.3
network / infrastructure use · Payments & money
QNT · scope-specific stage: Live production
capital-markets integration / tokenized deposits / digital-bond settlement
Canonical participating scope: Murex / MX.3
Murex independently integrated Quant Flow/Overledger into MX.3.
- System implication
- potentially powerful embedded distribution into financial institutions.
- Public-token implication
- current relationship primarily supports company/infrastructure thesis.
- What is not proven
- Fusion use, QNT requirement, downstream client commercial terms or aggregate Quant revenue.
Tier A · 2026 · Active
Ledger v4; Quant frozen report; Murex
Verify QNT-MUREX-01OracleQNTcross-ledger orchestration / tokenized financial workflowsLive productionToken implication → inspect limitsconditional.QNT-ORACLE-01 · expand to understand
Oracle
network / infrastructure use · Tokenized assets
QNT · scope-specific stage: Live production
cross-ledger orchestration / tokenized financial workflows
Canonical participating scope: Oracle
Oracle independently certified/integrated Overledger for cross-ledger operations and demonstrated tokenized-bond/deposit-token/CBDC-style DvP workflows.
- System implication
- strong independent enterprise validation and distribution.
- Public-token implication
- conditional.
- What is not proven
- permanent Oracle dependency, Fusion use or QNT economics.
Tier A · 2026 · Active
Ledger v4; Quant frozen report; Oracle
Verify QNT-ORACLE-01Dentsu Soken / QuantQNTprogrammable stablecoin / digital-money settlement in JapanInfrastructure / enablerToken implication → inspect limitsindirect.QNT-DENTSU-SOKEN-JAPAN-01 · expand to understand
Dentsu Soken / Quant
network / infrastructure use · Payments & money
QNT · scope-specific stage: Infrastructure / enabler
programmable stablecoin / digital-money settlement in Japan
Canonical participating scope: Dentsu Soken / Quant
Dentsu Soken independently announced a business partnership to distribute Quant infrastructure in Japan.
- System implication
- credible Japanese distribution path.
- Public-token implication
- indirect.
- What is not proven
- named bank production deployment, Fusion use or QNT economics.
Tier B · January 2026 · Active
Ledger v4; Quant frozen report
Verify QNT-DENTSU-SOKEN-JAPAN-01VisaSOLUSDC settlementLive productionToken implication → inspect limitsmandatory backend fees only; proportional token capture unproven.SOL-VISA-USDC-01 · expand to understand
Visa
network / infrastructure use · Payments & money
SOL · scope-specific stage: Live production
USDC settlement
Canonical participating scope: Visa
Visa has used Solana for USDC settlement.
- System implication
- hard institutional payment/settlement validation.
- Public-token implication
- mandatory backend fees only; proportional token capture unproven.
- What is not proven
- Solana-exclusive settlement, current attributable settlement volume or material SOL balance demand.
Tier A · live production / ongoing · Active
Ledger v4; Solana frozen report; Visa
Verify SOL-VISA-USDC-01PayPal / PYUSD / HyperwalletSOLstablecoin distribution and business payoutsLive productionToken implication → inspect limitsindirect.SOL-PAYPAL-PYUSD-01 · expand to understand
PayPal / PYUSD / Hyperwallet
access / distribution · Payments & money
SOL · scope-specific stage: Live production
stablecoin distribution and business payouts
Canonical participating scope: PayPal / PYUSD / Hyperwallet
PYUSD is available on Solana and PayPal terms identify a Solana-specific Hyperwallet payout pathway.
- System implication
- payment/fintech distribution proof.
- Public-token implication
- indirect.
- What is not proven
- Solana-exclusive PYUSD adoption or material attributable SOL economics.
Tier A · live production · Active
Ledger v4; Solana frozen report
Verify SOL-PAYPAL-PYUSD-01Western Union / Anchorage Digital Bank / NoahSOLSolana-issued USDPT remittance infrastructure and named Receiver Redirect implementation partnerLive productionToken implication → inspect limitsActual USDPT network transfers require backend SOL fees; low fees and potential sponsorship mean proportional token capture remains unproven.SOL-WU-USDPT-01 · expand to understand
Western Union / Anchorage Digital Bank / Noah
financial product / asset deployment · Payments & money
SOL · scope-specific stage: Live production
Solana-issued USDPT remittance infrastructure and named Receiver Redirect implementation partner
Canonical participating scope: Western Union; Anchorage Digital Bank; Noah
Western Union introduced USDPT on Solana with Anchorage Digital Bank issuance and existing Stablecard channels. On 20 October, Western Union and infrastructure provider Noah confirmed that Noah was chosen to power the forthcoming Receiver Redirect mechanism for treasury, conversion, prefunding and compliance, enabling users to receive remittance proceeds in USDPT.
- System implication
- Identifies a concrete implementation provider for a large incumbent remittance network, making the forward payout architecture more credible while preserving current rollout uncertainty.
- Public-token implication
- Actual USDPT network transfers require backend SOL fees; low fees and potential sponsorship mean proportional token capture remains unproven.
- What is not proven
- Receiver Redirect live settlement transactions, number of supported active countries/corridors, user adoption, payment balances, stablecoin supply attributed to program or measurable SOL fees. Western Union broader customers, currencies and agent network are prospective reach, not active Solana users.
Tier A · 4 May–20 October 2026 · Active
Western Union historic USDPT launch; Noah original 20 Oct 2026 — https://noah.io/blog/noah-western-union-partnership ; GlobeNewswire — https://rss.globenewswire.com/news-release/2026/10/21/3385265/0/en/western-union-selects-noah-to-power-global-stablecoin-payments-network.html
Verify SOL-WU-USDPT-01Fiserv Digital Asset Platform / Bank of North Dakota / VersaBank USA / FireblocksSOLbank token-deposit / stablecoin issuance, custody and bank-to-bank transactionsLive productionToken implication → inspect limitsclean backend SOL fee exposure exists, but current bank-platform economics can remain fee-light and do not establish persistent institutional SOL ownership.SOL-FISERV-FIUSD-01 · expand to understand
Fiserv Digital Asset Platform / Bank of North Dakota / VersaBank USA / Fireblocks
financial product / asset deployment · Payments & money
SOL · scope-specific stage: Live production
bank token-deposit / stablecoin issuance, custody and bank-to-bank transactions
Canonical participating scope: Fiserv Digital Asset Platform; Bank of North Dakota; VersaBank USA; Fireblocks
Fiserv's Digital Asset Platform entered production on 1 October 2026. Its first live use case is Bank of North Dakota's dollar-backed Roughrider Coin; Fiserv states transactions are processed on Solana, while VersaBank USA handles issuance/minting/burning/custody/reserves and Fireblocks provides digital-asset infrastructure. Participating institutions use Fiserv Commercial Center, and more than 90 North Dakota banks and credit unions are eligible to use the platform for bank-to-bank transactions.
- System implication
- materially upgrades the Fiserv branch from distribution capacity to live bank-facing production and demonstrates a strong abstraction model in which conventional banks can use familiar software while Solana operates underneath as the public transaction rail.
- Public-token implication
- clean backend SOL fee exposure exists, but current bank-platform economics can remain fee-light and do not establish persistent institutional SOL ownership.
- What is not proven
- that all 90+ eligible institutions are actively transacting; current transaction volume, balances or Solana-specific FIUSD scale; material persistent SOL inventory; or economically material SOL fee/burn demand from the platform.
Tier A · 2026–1 October 2026 · Active
Fiserv 1 Oct. 2026 launch — https://investors.fiserv.com/news-releases/news-release-details/fiserv-digital-asset-platform-goes-live-financial-institution ; Bank of North Dakota Roughrider Coin — https://bnd.nd.gov/roughrider/
Verify SOL-FISERV-FIUSD-01Allfunds / Solana Foundation / ioBuilders/AssetoSOLtokenized-fund distributionScheduled / committed deploymentToken implication → inspect limitsfuture conditional.SOL-ALLFUNDS-HARMONIA-01 · expand to understand
Allfunds / Solana Foundation / ioBuilders/Asseto
access / distribution · Tokenized assets
SOL · scope-specific stage: Scheduled / committed deployment
tokenized-fund distribution
Canonical participating scope: Allfunds; Solana Foundation; ioBuilders/Asseto
Harmonia opened a funded/commercial selection process with first admitted funds targeted for Q1 2027.
- System implication
- high-potential institutional fund distribution path.
- Public-token implication
- future conditional.
- What is not proven
- that Allfunds' ~€1.9T AUA is committed Solana capital or that material Solana AUM has arrived.
Tier B · June–September 2026 · Monitoring
Ledger v4; Solana frozen report
Verify SOL-ALLFUNDS-HARMONIA-01R3SOLcurated RWA yield / Corda-to-Solana public liquidityDocumented roadmapToken implication → inspect limitsfuture conditional.SOL-R3-CORDA-PROTOCOL-01 · expand to understand
R3
network / infrastructure use · Tokenized assets
SOL · scope-specific stage: Documented roadmap
curated RWA yield / Corda-to-Solana public liquidity
Canonical participating scope: R3
R3 announced Corda Protocol as a Solana-native RWA path.
- System implication
- strategically important private-to-public bridge if realized.
- Public-token implication
- future conditional.
- What is not proven
- scaled production launch or attributable Solana capital.
Tier B · 2026 · Monitoring
Solana frozen report; R3
Verify SOL-R3-CORDA-PROTOCOL-01Aave Horizon / RWA collateralAAVEtokenized-RWA-backed stablecoin borrowingLive productionToken implication → inspect limitsindirect unless retained economics are routed to AAVE.AAVE-HORIZON-RWA-CREDIT-01 · expand to understand
Aave Horizon / RWA collateral
financial product / asset deployment · Credit & collateral
AAVE · scope-specific stage: Live production
tokenized-RWA-backed stablecoin borrowing
Canonical participating scope: Aave Horizon / RWA collateral
Horizon contains real RWA-backed borrowing; JAAA had about $44.4M supplied with positions carrying RLUSD/GHO debt.
- System implication
- Aave has advanced from tokenized-asset support to actual RWA credit.
- Public-token implication
- indirect unless retained economics are routed to AAVE.
- What is not proven
- broad diversified conventional institutional borrowing.
Tier A · September 2026 · Active
Aave frozen report
Verify AAVE-HORIZON-RWA-CREDIT-01Aave V4 / Circle ArcAAVEArc-native shared creditLive productionToken implication → inspect limitsfuture AAVE impact remains routing-dependent.AAVE-V4-ARC-01 · expand to understand
Aave V4 / Circle Arc
financial product / asset deployment · Credit & collateral
AAVE · scope-specific stage: Live production
Arc-native shared credit
Canonical participating scope: Aave V4 / Circle Arc
Arc Core reached about $232.1M; its USDC draw line reached ~$51M / 100% utilization; governance materials describe at least $2M/year protocol-revenue support for five years.
- System implication
- strong stablecoin/institutional-credit distribution.
- Public-token implication
- future AAVE impact remains routing-dependent.
- What is not proven
- public legal enforceability or an unquestioned $10M receivable.
Tier A · September 2026 · Active
Aave frozen report; Aave governance
Verify AAVE-V4-ARC-01Coinbase / Aave V4 BaseAAVEtokenized U.S. equity collateralLive productionToken implication → inspect limitsindirect.AAVE-COINBASE-TOKENIZED-EQUITIES-01 · expand to understand
Coinbase / Aave V4 Base
financial product / asset deployment · Credit & collateral
AAVE · scope-specific stage: Live production
tokenized U.S. equity collateral
Canonical participating scope: Coinbase / Aave V4 Base
seven Coinbase-issued tokenized U.S. technology stocks became usable as collateral on Aave V4 Base for USDC borrowing in eligible non-U.S. markets.
- System implication
- extends tokenized securities into live credit.
- Public-token implication
- indirect.
- What is not proven
- material economic scale yet.
Tier A · 25 September 2026 · Active
Aave frozen report; Aave/Coinbase product release
Verify AAVE-COINBASE-TOKENIZED-EQUITIES-01Aave Institutional / custodied collateralAAVEinstitutional credit / off-protocol custody collateralProposal / draftToken implication → inspect limitszero current capture credit.AAVE-INSTITUTIONAL-FORWARD-01 · expand to understand
Aave Institutional / custodied collateral
financial product / asset deployment · Credit & collateral
AAVE · scope-specific stage: Proposal / draft
institutional credit / off-protocol custody collateral
Canonical participating scope: Aave Institutional / custodied collateral
governance ARFCs exist for Aave Institutional and custodied-collateral lending.
- System implication
- credible institutional expansion option.
- Public-token implication
- zero current capture credit.
- What is not proven
- funded production or current revenue.
Tier B · September 2026 · Monitoring
Aave frozen report; governance ARFCs
Verify AAVE-INSTITUTIONAL-FORWARD-01Sentora / Aave V4AAVEexternally curated Hub/Spoke creditProposal / draftToken implication → inspect limitsno current capture credit.AAVE-V4-EXTERNAL-CURATION-01 · expand to understand
Sentora / Aave V4
financial product / asset deployment · Credit & collateral
AAVE · scope-specific stage: Proposal / draft
externally curated Hub/Spoke credit
Canonical participating scope: Sentora / Aave V4
Sentora proposed bounded external curation with the DAO retaining smart-contract/admin ownership and a proposed 50% instance-revenue share.
- System implication
- potential response to professional-curator models.
- Public-token implication
- no current capture credit.
- What is not proven
- approval, funded deployment or revenue.
Tier B · 28 September 2026 · Monitoring
Aave frozen report; governance ARFC
Verify AAVE-V4-EXTERNAL-CURATION-01Robinhood ChainUNIconcentrated fee/revenue contributionLive scaled productionToken implication → inspect limitsUNI capture is materially dependent on one externally controlled ecosystem.UNI-ROBINHOOD-CONCENTRATION-01 · expand to understand
Robinhood Chain
network / infrastructure use · Protocol economics
UNI · scope-specific stage: Live scaled production
concentrated fee/revenue contribution
Canonical participating scope: Robinhood Chain
Robinhood contributed ~49% of 30-day volume, ~70.2% of gross fees and ~58.1% of protocol revenue while representing only ~6.9% of TVL.
- System implication
- major distribution success but unusually concentrated recent economics.
- Public-token implication
- UNI capture is materially dependent on one externally controlled ecosystem.
- What is not proven
- durability or tokenized-equity share.
Tier A · September 2026 · Active
Uniswap frozen report; DefiLlama
Verify UNI-ROBINHOOD-CONCENTRATION-01SparkUNIinstitutional/protocol stablecoin liquidityLive productionToken implication → inspect limitscurrent/future UNI benefit depends on fee-bearing execution.UNI-SPARK-V4-01 · expand to understand
Spark
financial product / asset deployment · Tokenized assets
UNI · scope-specific stage: Live production
institutional/protocol stablecoin liquidity
Canonical participating scope: Spark
Spark moved $150M of liquidity to Uniswap v4 and announced DualPool hook development.
- System implication
- funded sophisticated-liquidity adoption.
- Public-token implication
- current/future UNI benefit depends on fee-bearing execution.
- What is not proven
- recurring protocol-fee economics from the future hook.
Tier A · 2026 · Active
Uniswap frozen report; Uniswap Labs
Verify UNI-SPARK-V4-01Uniswap app / wallet / APIUNItokenized securities / RWA trading accessLive productionToken implication → inspect limitsno direct capture credit beyond demonstrated fee-bearing pools.UNI-TOKENIZED-SECURITIES-01 · expand to understand
Uniswap app / wallet / API
financial product / asset deployment · Tokenized assets
UNI · scope-specific stage: Live production
tokenized securities / RWA trading access
Canonical participating scope: Uniswap app / wallet / API
tokenized-securities access/routing is live; first-party reporting cited $9.1B cumulative RWA swaps, 2.6M transactions and 140K wallets.
- System implication
- credible public-market infrastructure for tokenized assets.
- Public-token implication
- no direct capture credit beyond demonstrated fee-bearing pools.
- What is not proven
- current fee-bearing 30-day tokenized-asset volume or attributable UNI burn.
Tier B · June–September 2026 · Active
Uniswap frozen report; Uniswap Labs
Verify UNI-TOKENIZED-SECURITIES-01Uniswap v4 Permissioned Pools / Superstate / Securitize / DowgoUNIcompliance-gated institutional liquidityInfrastructure / enablerToken implication → inspect limitszero material current capture credit until fee-bearing volume appears.UNI-PERMISSIONED-POOLS-01 · expand to understand
Uniswap v4 Permissioned Pools / Superstate / Securitize / Dowgo
network / infrastructure use · Tokenized assets
UNI · scope-specific stage: Infrastructure / enabler
compliance-gated institutional liquidity
Canonical participating scope: Uniswap v4 Permissioned Pools / Superstate / Securitize / Dowgo
an open technical Permissioned Pools standard exists and can enforce compliance-gated participation.
- System implication
- solves an important institutional-market design requirement.
- Public-token implication
- zero material current capture credit until fee-bearing volume appears.
- What is not proven
- material recurring live liquidity, volume or protocol fees.
Tier B · July–September 2026 · Active
Uniswap frozen report; Uniswap Labs
Verify UNI-PERMISSIONED-POOLS-01UnichainUNIUniswap-owned L2 execution / sequencer economicsLive productionToken implication → inspect limitscurrent direct contribution is immaterial.UNI-UNICHAIN-01 · expand to understand
Unichain
network / infrastructure use · Access & infrastructure
UNI · scope-specific stage: Live production
Uniswap-owned L2 execution / sequencer economics
Canonical participating scope: Unichain
Unichain was live but current chain fees/revenue and Uniswap protocol revenue were economically small near cutoff; net sequencer economics are intended to route toward Firepit.
- System implication
- improves system integration/control.
- Public-token implication
- current direct contribution is immaterial.
- What is not proven
- material current UNI revenue from Unichain.
Tier A · September 2026 · Active
Uniswap frozen report; DefiLlama
Verify UNI-UNICHAIN-01ProgmatAVAXregulated Japanese digital-securities infrastructureLive scaled productionToken implication → inspect limitsWeak direct token transmission beyond shared control-plane/PAYG unless further AVAX roles emerge.AVAX-PROGMAT-01 · expand to understand
Progmat
financial product / asset deployment · Tokenized assets
AVAX · scope-specific stage: Live scaled production
regulated Japanese digital-securities infrastructure
Canonical participating scope: Progmat
Progmat completed migration of more than ¥452B of regulated Japanese securities from Corda into a dedicated Avalanche L1.
- System implication
- Hard institutional securities-production proof.
- Public-token implication
- Weak direct token transmission beyond shared control-plane/PAYG unless further AVAX roles emerge.
- What is not proven
- Proportional AVAX balances, fees or reserve demand from the migrated notional; Progmat remains multichain-forward.
Tier A · 2026 · Active
Ledger v4; Avalanche frozen report
Verify AVAX-PROGMAT-01Dinari Financial NetworkAVAXtokenized-equity coordination and system-of-record L1Live productionToken implication → inspect limitsCapture remains conditional because the L1 can use sovereign economics.AVAX-DINARI-L1-01 · expand to understand
Dinari Financial Network
financial product / asset deployment · Tokenized assets
AVAX · scope-specific stage: Live production
tokenized-equity coordination and system-of-record L1
Canonical participating scope: Dinari Financial Network
Dinari operates a dedicated Avalanche L1 for orchestration, governance/order coordination and multichain tokenized-equity distribution.
- System implication
- Proves sovereign-L1 coordination product-market fit.
- Public-token implication
- Capture remains conditional because the L1 can use sovereign economics.
- What is not proven
- Large mandatory AVAX demand or exclusive Avalanche liquidity.
Tier A · 2026 · Active
Ledger v4; Avalanche frozen report
Verify AVAX-DINARI-L1-01BroadridgeAVAXtokenized-equity governance / corporate actionsLive productionToken implication → inspect limitsDirect AVAX capture remains limited by sovereign-L1 economics.AVAX-BROADRIDGE-GOVERNANCE-01 · expand to understand
Broadridge
financial product / asset deployment · Tokenized assets
AVAX · scope-specific stage: Live production
tokenized-equity governance / corporate actions
Canonical participating scope: Broadridge
Broadridge uses an Avalanche L1 for tokenized-equity governance, corporate-action/proxy-voting records and multichain distribution.
- System implication
- Hard institutional governance infrastructure.
- Public-token implication
- Direct AVAX capture remains limited by sovereign-L1 economics.
- What is not proven
- That Broadridge's much larger DLR repo activity runs on Avalanche.
Tier A · 2026 · Active
Ledger v4; Avalanche frozen report
Verify AVAX-BROADRIDGE-GOVERNANCE-01IntainAVAXstructured-finance / securitizationLive productionToken implication → inspect limitsPublic-token path is weak unless the environment uses additional AVAX-linked economics.AVAX-INTAIN-01 · expand to understand
Intain
financial product / asset deployment · Credit & collateral
AVAX · scope-specific stage: Live production
structured-finance / securitization
Canonical participating scope: Intain
Intain operates institution-specific structured-finance workflows in a permissioned Avalanche environment.
- System implication
- Validates Avalanche in structured finance.
- Public-token implication
- Public-token path is weak unless the environment uses additional AVAX-linked economics.
- What is not proven
- That broader Intain assets under administration equal Avalanche balances or throughput.
Tier A · 2026 · Active
Ledger v4; Avalanche frozen report
Verify AVAX-INTAIN-01SecuritizeAVAXregulated funds/securities on C-ChainLive productionToken implication → inspect limitsIndirect gas/burn only unless activity is frequent.AVAX-SECURITIZE-PUBLIC-ASSETS-01 · expand to understand
Securitize
financial product / asset deployment · Tokenized assets
AVAX · scope-specific stage: Live production
regulated funds/securities on C-Chain
Canonical participating scope: Securitize
Securitize distributes multiple regulated funds/securities on Avalanche, including HINC and other assets.
- System implication
- Broadens regulated-asset footprint.
- Public-token implication
- Indirect gas/burn only unless activity is frequent.
- What is not proven
- Equal funded scale, holder breadth or transfer intensity across products.
Tier A · 2026 · Active
Ledger v4; Avalanche frozen report
Verify AVAX-SECURITIZE-PUBLIC-ASSETS-01Aave V4AVAXpublic lending / future RWA liquidity hubsLive productionToken implication → inspect limitsSupports AVAX collateral/gas but no major new RWA-capture credit yet.AVAX-AAVE-V4-01 · expand to understand
Aave V4
financial product / asset deployment · Credit & collateral
AVAX · scope-specific stage: Live production
public lending / future RWA liquidity hubs
Canonical participating scope: Aave V4
Aave V4 is live on Avalanche as its first deployment beyond Ethereum and supports AVAX/LST collateral plus future specialized hubs.
- System implication
- Strengthens public credit/liquidity relevance.
- Public-token implication
- Supports AVAX collateral/gas but no major new RWA-capture credit yet.
- What is not proven
- Scaled live RWA-collateral borrowing at the cutoff.
Tier A · 2026 · Active
Ledger v4; Avalanche frozen report
Verify AVAX-AAVE-V4-01Grove / GalaxySKYinstitutional crypto-backed warehouse lendingLive scaled productionToken implication → inspect limitscontributes to Sky earnings; no automatic direct SKY requirement from the loan book.SKY-GALAXY-WAREHOUSE-01 · expand to understand
Grove / Galaxy
financial product / asset deployment · Credit & collateral
SKY · scope-specific stage: Live scaled production
institutional crypto-backed warehouse lending
Canonical participating scope: Grove / Galaxy
Grove established a $500M Galaxy warehouse facility with approximately $304M–$375M deployed in relevant snapshots.
- System implication
- hard institutional structured-credit production.
- Public-token implication
- contributes to Sky earnings; no automatic direct SKY requirement from the loan book.
- What is not proven
- full utilization or future credit-loss performance.
Tier A · 2026 · Active
Sky frozen report; Grove/Galaxy
Verify SKY-GALAXY-WAREHOUSE-01Galaxy DigitalSKYinstitutional treasury, collateral and direct SKY demandLive productionToken implication → inspect limitsdirect externally funded SKY demand plus USDS demand.SKY-GALAXY-BILATERAL-01 · expand to understand
Galaxy Digital
access / distribution · Capital & market access
SKY · scope-specific stage: Live production
institutional treasury, collateral and direct SKY demand
Canonical participating scope: Galaxy Digital
Galaxy placed $100M of treasury into sUSDS, approved sUSDS as collateral across its institutional trading business and disclosed a direct SKY purchase.
- System implication
- strongest bilateral institutional adoption evidence.
- Public-token implication
- direct externally funded SKY demand plus USDS demand.
- What is not proven
- repeat purchase scale or broad institutional replication.
Tier A · 2026 · Active
Sky frozen report; Galaxy/Sky partnership
Verify SKY-GALAXY-BILATERAL-01Sky / Grove / institutional asset portfolioSKYtokenized Treasuries and RWA exposureLive scaled productionToken implication → inspect limitscontributes to earnings but not direct mandatory SKY demand.SKY-RWA-BOOK-01 · expand to understand
Sky / Grove / institutional asset portfolio
financial product / asset deployment · Tokenized assets
SKY · scope-specific stage: Live scaled production
tokenized Treasuries and RWA exposure
Canonical participating scope: Sky / Grove / institutional asset portfolio
Grove held roughly $856.5M JTRSY and ~$717M BUIDL, alongside other institutional asset exposures.
- System implication
- major live institutional-RWA integration.
- Public-token implication
- contributes to earnings but not direct mandatory SKY demand.
- What is not proven
- zero credit/liquidity/custody/legal risk.
Tier A · September 2026 · Active
Sky frozen report
Verify SKY-RWA-BOOK-01Spark / Grove / Obex / Sky CoreSKYPrime-to-Core economic transmissionLive scaled productionToken implication → inspect limitssupports the revenue base funding SKY acquisition.SKY-PRIME-SETTLEMENT-01 · expand to understand
Spark / Grove / Obex / Sky Core
network / infrastructure use · Capital allocation
SKY · scope-specific stage: Live scaled production
Prime-to-Core economic transmission
Canonical participating scope: Spark / Grove / Obex / Sky Core
August settlement showed the majority of current supply-side economics from major Prime books flowing back toward Sky Core.
- System implication
- Prime specialization is not purely value leakage.
- Public-token implication
- supports the revenue base funding SKY acquisition.
- What is not proven
- that all Agent economics accrue to Sky Core.
Tier A · August 2026 settlement · Active
Sky frozen report
Verify SKY-PRIME-SETTLEMENT-01Robinhood / Spark / SkySKYdecentralized yield distributionLive productionToken implication → inspect limitsindirect, unlike Galaxy's disclosed direct SKY purchase.SKY-ROBINHOOD-SPARK-01 · expand to understand
Robinhood / Spark / Sky
access / distribution · Capital allocation
SKY · scope-specific stage: Live production
decentralized yield distribution
Canonical participating scope: Robinhood / Spark / Sky
Robinhood launched a decentralized yield product and Sky/Spark enabled related USDG/Robinhood Chain infrastructure and liquidity.
- System implication
- external consumer/fintech distribution.
- Public-token implication
- indirect, unlike Galaxy's disclosed direct SKY purchase.
- What is not proven
- direct material SKY acquisition attributable to the product.
Tier A · 2026 · Active
Sky frozen report
Verify SKY-ROBINHOOD-SPARK-01DayaSUIlive stablecoin settlementLive productionToken implication → inspect limitshard live SUI-holding bypass.SUI-DAYA-PAYMENTS-01 · expand to understand
Daya
network / infrastructure use · Payments & money
SUI · scope-specific stage: Live production
live stablecoin settlement
Canonical participating scope: Daya
Daya independently supports Sui as a live stablecoin settlement rail and explicitly abstracts the network token from users.
- System implication
- strong production payments evidence.
- Public-token implication
- hard live SUI-holding bypass.
- What is not proven
- Sui-specific payment volume.
Tier A · 2026 · Active
Sui frozen report
Verify SUI-DAYA-PAYMENTS-01PagaSUIUSDsui payments / enterprise API / RWA settlementScheduled / committed deploymentToken implication → inspect limitsfuture sponsor/gas demand only; Paga remains multichain.SUI-PAGA-USD-SUI-01 · expand to understand
Paga
financial product / asset deployment · Payments & money
SUI · scope-specific stage: Scheduled / committed deployment
USDsui payments / enterprise API / RWA settlement
Canonical participating scope: Paga
Paga selected Sui as the primary blockchain for its initial USDsui initiative serving consumer and enterprise API environments.
- System implication
- high-quality privileged architecture selection.
- Public-token implication
- future sponsor/gas demand only; Paga remains multichain.
- What is not proven
- Sui-specific production volume; Paga's >$11B company-wide payments volume is not Sui volume.
Tier A · 2026 · Monitoring
Sui frozen report
Verify SUI-PAGA-USD-SUI-01Neuberger Berman / Securitize / HINCSUItokenized institutional fixed-income fundLive productionToken implication → inspect limitsindirect gas/staking/proxy benefit only.SUI-NEUBERGER-HINC-01 · expand to understand
Neuberger Berman / Securitize / HINC
financial product / asset deployment · Tokenized assets
SUI · scope-specific stage: Live production
tokenized institutional fixed-income fund
Canonical participating scope: Neuberger Berman / Securitize / HINC
HINC had approximately $10.7M of tracked funded exposure on Sui at the audited snapshot.
- System implication
- genuine funded institutional production.
- Public-token implication
- indirect gas/staking/proxy benefit only.
- What is not proven
- large or durable Sui-specific AUM.
Tier A · August–September 2026 · Active
Ledger v4; Sui frozen report
Verify SUI-NEUBERGER-HINC-01tZEROSUIregulated digital-securities issuance, transfer agency, custody, trading and settlementLive productionToken implication → inspect limitsindirect until funded securities activity develops.SUI-TZERO-SECURITIES-01 · expand to understand
tZERO
network / infrastructure use · Tokenized assets
SUI · scope-specific stage: Live production
regulated digital-securities issuance, transfer agency, custody, trading and settlement
Canonical participating scope: tZERO
tZERO integrated Sui into its U.S.-regulated securities infrastructure.
- System implication
- material regulated-market infrastructure.
- Public-token implication
- indirect until funded securities activity develops.
- What is not proven
- material Sui-specific securities issuance/trading/AUM; tZERO's ICE relationship does not prove ICE selected Sui.
Tier A · 25 August 2026 · Active
Ledger v4; Sui frozen report
Verify SUI-TZERO-SECURITIES-01Sui Foundation / Hashi launch coalition / Anchorage Digital / BitGo / Cumberland / FalconX / BullishSUInative-Bitcoin-backed institutional credit, vaults and collateral financing on SuiScheduled / committed deploymentDated research classification; exact source and measurement limits apply below.Token implication → inspect limitsno present quantified SUI capture. Potential backend gas/storage demand remains fee-light and cannot be inferred from committed BTC collateral value.SUI-HASHI-BTC-CREDIT-01 · expand to understand
Sui Foundation / Hashi launch coalition / Anchorage Digital / BitGo / Cumberland / FalconX / Bullish
financial product / asset deployment · Credit & collateral
SUI · scope-specific stage: Scheduled / committed deployment
native-Bitcoin-backed institutional credit, vaults and collateral financing on Sui
Canonical participating scope: Sui Foundation; Hashi launch coalition; Anchorage Digital; BitGo; Cumberland; FalconX; Bullish
Sui Foundation announced that Hashi will begin phased mainnet rollout later in October 2026 with more than $500M of announced capital commitments and more than 20 ecosystem partners. Hashi's design secures native BTC on Bitcoin and represents eligible deposited collateral through hBTC on Sui for prospective lending, borrowing, credit and vault applications. Anchorage Digital independently confirmed its launch-partner role, with planned qualified-custody tri-party access through Atlas, self-custody through Porto and stablecoin-liquidity support.
Dated research scope / source limitation · September–8 October 2026 $500 million committed does not mean $500 million funded, deposited, lent or already earning fees. Scheduled launch is not completed live production. testnet previously live; Sui Foundation on 8 October announced a phased Hashi mainnet rollout later in October 2026 backed by more than $500M in capital commitments; mainnet launch and funded collateral are not yet verified Canonical Stage, Tier and Lifecycle are research classifications retained from the accepted Ledger; this notice is not new source verification.
- System implication
- advances a previously tested BTC-backed credit architecture to a dated, institutionally supported launch commitment; production impact remains conditional on funded deployment and repeated use.
- Public-token implication
- no present quantified SUI capture. Potential backend gas/storage demand remains fee-light and cannot be inferred from committed BTC collateral value.
- What is not proven
- completed mainnet go-live as of 12 October; that $500M is already deposited, borrowed or deployed; live hBTC balances, first institutional loans, collateral velocity, lender revenue, enduring adoption, or material incremental SUI gas/storage demand or externally sourced SUI buying.
Tier B · September–8 October 2026 · Monitoring
Sui Foundation, 8 Oct. 2026 — https://www.sui.io/blog/hashi-mainnet-to-launch-with-500m-in-capital-backing-adds-anchorage-digital-to-coalition ; Anchorage Digital launch-partner confirmation — https://www.anchorage.com/press-room/anchorage-digital-joins-hashi-as-a-day-1-launch-partner ; Sui frozen report
Verify SUI-HASHI-BTC-CREDIT-01Figure / YLDSSUItokenized yield asset / DeepBook-linked financial useScheduled / committed deploymentToken implication → inspect limitsindirect until funded usage exists.SUI-FIGURE-YLDS-01 · expand to understand
Figure / YLDS
financial product / asset deployment · Tokenized assets
SUI · scope-specific stage: Scheduled / committed deployment
tokenized yield asset / DeepBook-linked financial use
Canonical participating scope: Figure / YLDS
Figure publicly committed to deploy YLDS natively on Sui.
- System implication
- credible regulated-yield deployment path.
- Public-token implication
- indirect until funded usage exists.
- What is not proven
- material funded Sui-specific YLDS supply.
Tier B · 2026 · Monitoring
Sui frozen report
Verify SUI-FIGURE-YLDS-01DTCC / DTCXLMDTC-tokenized securities connectivity and lifecycle supportScheduled / committed deploymentToken implication → inspect limitsmostly future fee/reserve demand unless larger XLM roles emerge.XLM-DTCC-01 · expand to understand
DTCC / DTC
financial product / asset deployment · Tokenized assets
XLM · scope-specific stage: Scheduled / committed deployment
DTC-tokenized securities connectivity and lifecycle support
Canonical participating scope: DTCC / DTC
DTCC explicitly targets DTC-tokenized assets becoming available on Stellar in 1H27 within a standards-driven multi-chain strategy.
- System implication
- major FMI validation and forward deployment.
- Public-token implication
- mostly future fee/reserve demand unless larger XLM roles emerge.
- What is not proven
- current Stellar production balances, volume, collateral usage or future chain share.
Tier B · 27 May 2026 · Active
Ledger v4; Stellar audited report; DTCC
Verify XLM-DTCC-0121XXLMEU-regulated tokenized-securities trading and settlementLive productionToken implication → inspect limitsmandatory XLM usage remains small.XLM-21X-REGULATED-DISTRIBUTION-01 · expand to understand
21X
network / infrastructure use · Tokenized assets
XLM · scope-specific stage: Live production
EU-regulated tokenized-securities trading and settlement
Canonical participating scope: 21X
21X went live on Stellar under the EU DLT Pilot Regime with onchain order matching and atomic DvP capability.
- System implication
- hard regulated-market infrastructure evidence.
- Public-token implication
- mandatory XLM usage remains small.
- What is not proven
- Stellar-specific securities balances, trading volume or participant activity.
Tier A · 6 May 2026 · Active
Ledger v4; Stellar audited report; 21X
Verify XLM-21X-REGULATED-DISTRIBUTION-01U.S. BankXLMproprietary bank stablecoin / cross-border paymentLive productionToken implication → inspect limitssmall mandatory fee/reserve path only.XLM-USBANK-USBDC-01 · expand to understand
U.S. Bank
financial product / asset deployment · Payments & money
XLM · scope-specific stage: Live production
proprietary bank stablecoin / cross-border payment
Canonical participating scope: U.S. Bank
U.S. Bank completed a live cross-border transaction between North American and European entities using USBDC on public Stellar while integrating existing finance/risk/compliance/operations systems.
- System implication
- high-quality bank-issued-money production evidence.
- Public-token implication
- small mandatory fee/reserve path only.
- What is not proven
- transaction size, recurring client production or material XLM demand.
Tier A · 9 September 2026 · Active
Ledger v4; Stellar audited report; U.S. Bank
Verify XLM-USBANK-USBDC-01MoneyGramXLMstablecoin, remittance, cash access and network distributionLive scaled productionToken implication → inspect limitspayment growth does not imply proportional XLM demand.XLM-MONEYGRAM-01 · expand to understand
MoneyGram
access / distribution · Payments & money
XLM · scope-specific stage: Live scaled production
stablecoin, remittance, cash access and network distribution
Canonical participating scope: MoneyGram
MoneyGram launched native MGUSD on Stellar and remains a major payments/cash-access partner; it also became explicitly multichain through Tempo and Solana.
- System implication
- strong production validation plus clear multichain leakage.
- Public-token implication
- payment growth does not imply proportional XLM demand.
- What is not proven
- that MoneyGram network volume is predominantly Stellar or that the relationship is exclusive.
Tier A · 2026 · Corrected
Ledger v4; Stellar audited report; MoneyGram
Verify XLM-MONEYGRAM-01Marketnode / BNY InvestmentsXLMonchain institutional fund distributionScheduled / committed deploymentToken implication → inspect limitsfuture indirect.XLM-MARKETNODE-BNY-FUNDS-01 · expand to understand
Marketnode / BNY Investments
access / distribution · Tokenized assets
XLM · scope-specific stage: Scheduled / committed deployment
onchain institutional fund distribution
Canonical participating scope: Marketnode / BNY Investments
Marketnode plans to provide onchain access to selected BNY Investments funds through Stellar.
- System implication
- material institutional fund-distribution path.
- Public-token implication
- future indirect.
- What is not proven
- launched funded balances, transfer activity or XLM demand.
Tier B · 13 August 2026 · Monitoring
Ledger v4; Stellar audited report
Verify XLM-MARKETNODE-BNY-FUNDS-01BVNKXLMenterprise stablecoin payments / cross-border payouts / treasury disbursementsLive productionToken implication → inspect limitsindirect fee/reserve path only.XLM-BVNK-PAYMENTS-01 · expand to understand
BVNK
network / infrastructure use · Payments & money
XLM · scope-specific stage: Live production
enterprise stablecoin payments / cross-border payouts / treasury disbursements
Canonical participating scope: BVNK
BVNK integrated Stellar live into its enterprise stablecoin-payment platform, available across 130+ supported countries through a single API.
- System implication
- expands enterprise payments distribution.
- Public-token implication
- indirect fee/reserve path only.
- What is not proven
- Stellar-specific BVNK transaction volume; BVNK's stated $39B annualized platform volume is not Stellar volume.
Tier B · 22 September 2026 · Active
BVNK official release, 22 Sep 2026; Phase-C audit
Verify XLM-BVNK-PAYMENTS-01Aave DAO / TokenLogicLINKrecurring automation/workflow executionLive productionToken implication → inspect limitsshows monetizable recurring workload but not quantified LINK capture.LINK-CRE-AAVE-01 · expand to understand
Aave DAO / TokenLogic
network / infrastructure use · Access & infrastructure
LINK · scope-specific stage: Live production
recurring automation/workflow execution
Canonical participating scope: Aave DAO; TokenLogic
Aave migrated recurring Robot automation across 11 networks to CRE and operates a funded CRE organization account.
- System implication
- strongest independent recurring CRE production proof.
- Public-token implication
- shows monetizable recurring workload but not quantified LINK capture.
- What is not proven
- account funding amount, burn rate, unit pricing or aggregate CRE revenue.
Tier A · 2026 · Active
Chainlink frozen report; Aave governance
Verify LINK-CRE-AAVE-0121XLINKregulated exchange market-data workflowLive productionToken implication → inspect limitsconditional on commercial transmission.LINK-CRE-21X-01 · expand to understand
21X
network / infrastructure use · Access & infrastructure
LINK · scope-specific stage: Live production
regulated exchange market-data workflow
Canonical participating scope: 21X
21X independently states its CRE-powered Chainlink integration is live in production for real-time regulated-market data.
- System implication
- non-Aave recurring CRE production proof.
- Public-token implication
- conditional on commercial transmission.
- What is not proven
- commercial terms.
Tier A · 2026 · Active
Chainlink frozen report; 21X
Verify LINK-CRE-21X-01DTCCLINK24/7 collateral managementScheduled / committed deploymentToken implication → inspect limitsfuture conditional.LINK-DTCC-COLLATERAL-APPCHAIN-01 · expand to understand
DTCC
network / infrastructure use · Credit & collateral
LINK · scope-specific stage: Scheduled / committed deployment
24/7 collateral management
Canonical participating scope: DTCC
DTCC planned recurring collateral architecture using CRE and Chainlink data.
- System implication
- high-quality FMI forward deployment.
- Public-token implication
- future conditional.
- What is not proven
- scaled recurring production, contract revenue or LINK capture.
Tier B · 2026 · Monitoring
Ledger v4; Chainlink frozen report
Verify LINK-DTCC-COLLATERAL-APPCHAIN-01Chainlink / DTCC / institutional financing/collateral ecosystemLINKcross-chain securities financing, repo and collateral managementPilot / PoCToken implication → inspect limitsconditional on future commercial monetization and the fraction of economics transmitted into LINK.LINK-FULCRUM-01 · expand to understand
Chainlink / DTCC / institutional financing/collateral ecosystem
financial product / asset deployment · Credit & collateral
LINK · scope-specific stage: Pilot / PoC
cross-chain securities financing, repo and collateral management
Canonical participating scope: Chainlink; DTCC; institutional financing/collateral ecosystem
Chainlink introduced Fulcrum as an institutional financing/collateral layer designed to coordinate financing venues with cash and collateral settlement across public and private blockchains. Chainlink and DTCC demonstrated a cross-chain securities-financing/collateral workflow at Sibos.
- System implication
- expands Chainlink's institutional role from data/interoperability/orchestration into a purpose-built financing and collateral workflow layer, with high-quality FMI demonstration evidence.
- Public-token implication
- conditional on future commercial monetization and the fraction of economics transmitted into LINK.
- What is not proven
- live recurring production customers, financed notional, commercial revenue, Payment-Abstraction usage, Strategic Reserve inflows or attributable LINK acquisition from Fulcrum.
Tier B · 30 September 2026 · Monitoring
Chainlink 30 Sep. 2026 — https://chain.link/blog/introducing-chainlink-fulcrum
Verify LINK-FULCRUM-01Securitize / BlackRock BUIDL / Apollo ACREDAPTtokenized regulated funds / private marketsLive scaled productionToken implication → inspect limitsprincipally fees/proxy unless activity becomes transaction-intensive.APT-SECURITIZE-BUIDL-ACRED-01 · expand to understand
Securitize / BlackRock BUIDL / Apollo ACRED
financial product / asset deployment · Tokenized assets
APT · scope-specific stage: Live scaled production
tokenized regulated funds / private markets
Canonical participating scope: Securitize / BlackRock BUIDL / Apollo ACRED
BUIDL and ACRED maintain real Aptos-specific distributed balances; BUIDL represented roughly $161M and ACRED roughly $16M around the audited snapshot.
- System implication
- hard institutional qualification and repeat Securitize selection.
- Public-token implication
- principally fees/proxy unless activity becomes transaction-intensive.
- What is not proven
- exclusive Aptos use, broad holder diversity or proportional APT demand.
Tier A · 2026 · Active
Aptos frozen report
Verify APT-SECURITIZE-BUIDL-ACRED-01Franklin Templeton / BENJIAPTtokenized government money-market fundLive productionToken implication → inspect limitsindirect.APT-FRANKLIN-BENJI-01 · expand to understand
Franklin Templeton / BENJI
financial product / asset deployment · Tokenized assets
APT · scope-specific stage: Live production
tokenized government money-market fund
Canonical participating scope: Franklin Templeton / BENJI
Franklin Templeton BENJI supports Aptos with chain-specific infrastructure and funded balances.
- System implication
- repeat regulated-fund selection.
- Public-token implication
- indirect.
- What is not proven
- material Aptos exclusivity or high transaction intensity.
Tier A · 2026 · Active
Aptos frozen report
Verify APT-FRANKLIN-BENJI-01Dated funding qualification: Aptos Foundation reports more than $20M in new subscriptions upon BENJI’s Aptos launch. This supports initial funded availability, not a current Aptos balance; total multichain BENJI AUM is not Aptos AUM. No Aptos exclusivity, high turnover or substantial APT capture is inferred.
PACT / Pact Labs / BitGo / Tether-related financingAPTrepresented real-world loan creditLive scaled productionToken implication → inspect limitsweak unless servicing/transaction activity materially increases burn.APT-PACT-REAL-WORLD-CREDIT-01 · expand to understand
PACT / Pact Labs / BitGo / Tether-related financing
financial product / asset deployment · Credit & collateral
APT · scope-specific stage: Live scaled production
represented real-world loan credit
Canonical participating scope: PACT / Pact Labs / BitGo / Tether-related financing
PACT represents approximately $568M of real-world credit through Aptos infrastructure; BitGo supports relevant loan-NFT/collateral infrastructure and Pact Labs received external expansion funding.
- System implication
- major Aptos-native real-world financial workload.
- Public-token implication
- weak unless servicing/transaction activity materially increases burn.
- What is not proven
- $568M of DeFi TVL, freely composable capital or attributable Aptos transaction throughput.
Tier A · September 2026 · Active
Aptos frozen report
Verify APT-PACT-REAL-WORLD-CREDIT-01ArchaxAPTregulated securities distributionLive productionToken implication → inspect limitsindirect until transactions/balances scale.APT-ARCHAX-01 · expand to understand
Archax
access / distribution · Tokenized assets
APT · scope-specific stage: Live production
regulated securities distribution
Canonical participating scope: Archax
Archax supports Aptos for regulated-asset distribution and has a first product live.
- System implication
- regulated-asset distribution path.
- Public-token implication
- indirect until transactions/balances scale.
- What is not proven
- funded scale across the advertised 100+ securities distribution capacity.
Tier B · 2026 · Active
Ledger v4; Aptos frozen report
Verify APT-ARCHAX-01Source scope: the Aptos integration announcement and MembersCap fund history support product availability at Tier B. The advertised 100+ securities are distribution capacity, not 100 funded Aptos assets. Aptos-specific contracts, holders and balances are not established.
DecibelAPTAptos-native perpetuals / high-frequency executionLive scaled productionToken implication → inspect limitscreates burn, but app economics are much larger and DCBL creates value leakage.APT-DECIBEL-PRODUCTION-01 · expand to understand
Decibel
network / infrastructure use · Access & infrastructure
APT · scope-specific stage: Live scaled production
Aptos-native perpetuals / high-frequency execution
Canonical participating scope: Decibel
Decibel processed roughly $1.1B–$1.2B 30-day perp volume, ~$29.5M TVL, ~$3M–$5M OI and ~$0.45M–$0.52M application fees/revenue.
- System implication
- strongest real production proof of Aptos high-throughput execution.
- Public-token implication
- creates burn, but app economics are much larger and DCBL creates value leakage.
- What is not proven
- durable unincentivized user depth; sampled activity was highly concentrated and automated.
Tier A · September 2026 · Active
Aptos frozen report
Verify APT-DECIBEL-PRODUCTION-01Archax / Ownera / Open Collateral NetworkHBARtokenized MMF distribution / repo-collateral interoperabilityScheduled / committed deploymentToken implication → inspect limitsfuture conditional.HBAR-ARCHAX-OWNERA-OCN-01 · expand to understand
Archax / Ownera / Open Collateral Network
access / distribution · Credit & collateral
HBAR · scope-specific stage: Scheduled / committed deployment
tokenized MMF distribution / repo-collateral interoperability
Canonical participating scope: Archax / Ownera / Open Collateral Network
Ownera previously distributed an Archax/Hedera tokenized BlackRock-MMF interest through FinP2P; Archax is listed as coming to OCN, whose broader repo infrastructure is already in production.
- System implication
- strongest near-term financial conversion path.
- Public-token implication
- future conditional.
- What is not proven
- that Hedera-resident Archax assets will remain on Hedera in OCN production or any Hedera-specific OCN notional.
Tier B · 2024–September 2026 · Monitoring
Hedera audited report
Verify HBAR-ARCHAX-OWNERA-OCN-01RBA Project Acacia / Australian Payments Plus / ImperiumHBARinteroperable tokenized money / wholesale CBDC / asset settlementPilot / PoCToken implication → inspect limitspublic-HBAR capture remains conditional.HBAR-ACACIA-01 · expand to understand
RBA Project Acacia / Australian Payments Plus / Imperium
network / infrastructure use · Payments & money
HBAR · scope-specific stage: Pilot / PoC
interoperable tokenized money / wholesale CBDC / asset settlement
Canonical participating scope: RBA Project Acacia / Australian Payments Plus / Imperium
real-money institutional transactions used Hedera/HashSphere within Project Acacia.
- System implication
- high-quality institutional technical validation.
- Public-token implication
- public-HBAR capture remains conditional.
- What is not proven
- production ledger selection for the next commercial/build phase.
Tier A · 2025–2026 · Active
Ledger v4; Hedera audited report
Verify HBAR-ACACIA-01TaurusHBARcustody / staking / node / HTS issuance / EVM smart-contract supportLive productionToken implication → inspect limitsaccess/staking enabler, not adoption proof.HBAR-TAURUS-FULL-STACK-01 · expand to understand
Taurus
network / infrastructure use · Access & infrastructure
HBAR · scope-specific stage: Live production
custody / staking / node / HTS issuance / EVM smart-contract support
Canonical participating scope: Taurus
Taurus completed full Hedera support across its institutional stack serving 40+ banks/regulatory institutions.
- System implication
- substantially lowers institutional adoption friction.
- Public-token implication
- access/staking enabler, not adoption proof.
- What is not proven
- that those institutions selected Hedera or generated material public HBAR demand.
Tier A · 5 August 2026 · Active
Ledger v4; Hedera audited report
Verify HBAR-TAURUS-FULL-STACK-01Tata CommunicationsHBARsupplier billing / enterprise settlement recordsLive productionToken implication → inspect limitspotentially recurring HBAR fees, scale unmeasured.HBAR-TATA-SUPPLIER-BILLING-01 · expand to understand
Tata Communications
network / infrastructure use · Payments & money
HBAR · scope-specific stage: Live production
supplier billing / enterprise settlement records
Canonical participating scope: Tata Communications
ecosystem-side reporting states Tata Communications settles supplier billing 100% on Hedera across nearly 1,300 suppliers.
- System implication
- credible enterprise production beyond PoC.
- Public-token implication
- potentially recurring HBAR fees, scale unmeasured.
- What is not proven
- independently audited Tata transaction/revenue telemetry or expansion into telecom roaming.
Tier B · 2026 · Active
Hedera audited report
Verify HBAR-TATA-SUPPLIER-BILLING-01KAIO / institutional fund managers including Hamilton Lane and Brevan HowardHBARregulated tokenized-fund distribution / lifecycle automation / settlementLive productionToken implication → inspect limitsordinary HBAR fee demand applies when activity settles on public Hedera, but current magnitude and scarcity effect remain unproven.HBAR-KAIO-INSTITUTIONAL-FUNDS-01 · expand to understand
KAIO / institutional fund managers including Hamilton Lane and Brevan Howard
financial product / asset deployment · Tokenized assets
HBAR · scope-specific stage: Live production
regulated tokenized-fund distribution / lifecycle automation / settlement
Canonical participating scope: KAIO; institutional fund managers including Hamilton Lane and Brevan Howard
Hedera's current KAIO case study states that KAIO tokenizes and distributes regulated investment funds and uses Hedera as one of its settlement layers. KAIO's platform is reported to have facilitated more than $500M in transactions and to support approximately $200M in assets, including institutional funds from managers such as Hamilton Lane and Brevan Howard.
- System implication
- adds meaningful live institutional-fund infrastructure evidence to public Hedera, but platform-wide scale cannot be assigned to Hedera without chain-specific attribution.
- Public-token implication
- ordinary HBAR fee demand applies when activity settles on public Hedera, but current magnitude and scarcity effect remain unproven.
- What is not proven
- what share of KAIO's platform-wide transaction volume or assets is attributable specifically to Hedera; recurring Hedera fee/revenue magnitude; or material persistent HBAR inventory generated by KAIO activity.
Tier B · current 2026; verified 2 October 2026 · Active
Hedera KAIO case study, verified 2 Oct. 2026 — https://hedera.com/case-study/kaio/
Verify HBAR-KAIO-INSTITUTIONAL-FUNDS-01KrakenSYRUPonchain warehouse facility / OTC lending financeLive productionToken implication → inspect limitsno mandatory SYRUP.MAPLE-KRAKEN-WAREHOUSE-01 · expand to understand
Kraken
financial product / asset deployment · Credit & collateral
SYRUP · scope-specific stage: Live production
onchain warehouse facility / OTC lending finance
Canonical participating scope: Kraken
Kraken confirmed a USDC-denominated onchain warehouse structure with Maple senior financing, bankruptcy-remote SPV structure and BTC/ETH collateral.
- System implication
- hard institutional structured-credit production.
- Public-token implication
- no mandatory SYRUP.
- What is not proven
- that this structure becomes a dominant share of Maple assets.
Tier A · 2026 · Active
Ledger v4; Maple audited report
Verify MAPLE-KRAKEN-WAREHOUSE-01EthenaSYRUPinstitutional lending allocationLive productionToken implication → inspect limitsindirect.MAPLE-ETHENA-ALLOCATOR-01 · expand to understand
Ethena
financial product / asset deployment · Credit & collateral
SYRUP · scope-specific stage: Live production
institutional lending allocation
Canonical participating scope: Ethena
Ethena governance approved Maple as a direct institutional lending partner and funded exposure followed.
- System implication
- real external allocator demand.
- Public-token implication
- indirect.
- What is not proven
- permanent allocation size or exclusivity.
Tier A · 2026 · Active
Ledger v4; Maple audited report
Verify MAPLE-ETHENA-ALLOCATOR-01Spark / SkySYRUPstablecoin-system allocation to MapleLive scaled productionToken implication → inspect limitsno mandatory SYRUP.MAPLE-SPARK-SKY-ALLOCATOR-01 · expand to understand
Spark / Sky
financial product / asset deployment · Credit & collateral
SYRUP · scope-specific stage: Live scaled production
stablecoin-system allocation to Maple
Canonical participating scope: Spark / Sky
Spark/Sky deployed capital into Maple and later authorized additional capacity.
- System implication
- validates Maple as destination for large external stablecoin-system capital.
- Public-token implication
- no mandatory SYRUP.
- What is not proven
- that authorized capacity equals funded balance.
Tier A · 2026 · Active
Ledger v4; Maple audited report
Verify MAPLE-SPARK-SKY-ALLOCATOR-01BitwiseSYRUPinstitutional DeFi allocationLive productionToken implication → inspect limitsindirect.MAPLE-BITWISE-ALLOCATOR-01 · expand to understand
Bitwise
financial product / asset deployment · Capital allocation
SYRUP · scope-specific stage: Live production
institutional DeFi allocation
Canonical participating scope: Bitwise
Bitwise publicly allocated institutional capital through Maple.
- System implication
- institutional allocator validation.
- Public-token implication
- indirect.
- What is not proven
- large recurring amount or dominant capital-source status.
Tier B · 2026 · Active
Ledger v4
Verify MAPLE-BITWISE-ALLOCATOR-01Robinhood / syrupUSDGSYRUPfintech/consumer yield distributionLive scaled productionToken implication → inspect limitsproduct growth can bypass SYRUP.MAPLE-ROBINHOOD-SYRUPUSDG-01 · expand to understand
Robinhood / syrupUSDG
access / distribution · Credit & collateral
SYRUP · scope-specific stage: Live scaled production
fintech/consumer yield distribution
Canonical participating scope: Robinhood / syrupUSDG
Maple's syrupUSDG became embedded in Robinhood-linked Earn distribution and scaled materially.
- System implication
- strong fintech-distribution evidence.
- Public-token implication
- product growth can bypass SYRUP.
- What is not proven
- Robinhood as a Maple borrower or direct SYRUP ownership requirement.
Tier A · 2026 · Active
Ledger v4; Maple audited report
Verify MAPLE-ROBINHOOD-SYRUPUSDG-01Zodia CustodySYRUPcustody-compatible institutional borrowingLive productionToken implication → inspect limitsnone mandatory.MAPLE-ZODIA-INTERCHANGE-01 · expand to understand
Zodia Custody
financial product / asset deployment · Credit & collateral
SYRUP · scope-specific stage: Live production
custody-compatible institutional borrowing
Canonical participating scope: Zodia Custody
Zodia Interchange permits institutions to use segregated-custody collateral while borrowing through Maple.
- System implication
- removes a material institutional custody-policy barrier.
- Public-token implication
- none mandatory.
- What is not proven
- funded Maple-specific notional through the channel.
Tier B · 2026 · Active
Ledger v4; Maple audited report
Verify MAPLE-ZODIA-INTERCHANGE-01Marex / Canton Foundation governanceCCSuper Validator participation / institutional-market infrastructure commitmentScheduled / committed deploymentToken implication → inspect limitsnone directly; any CC impact depends on future paid public-GS traffic and marginal CC sourcing.CAN-MAREX-SUPER-VALIDATOR-01 · expand to understand
Marex / Canton Foundation governance
network / infrastructure use · Access & infrastructure
CC · scope-specific stage: Scheduled / committed deployment
Super Validator participation / institutional-market infrastructure commitment
Canonical participating scope: Marex; Canton Foundation governance
Canton governance approved CIP-0126, titled “Marex Super Validator Weight 10,” formally adding a major global financial-services firm to the approved Super Validator pipeline.
- System implication
- strengthens high-quality institutional governance/operating commitment and Canton's distribution into capital-markets participants, but remains forward evidence until production activity is visible.
- Public-token implication
- none directly; any CC impact depends on future paid public-GS traffic and marginal CC sourcing.
- What is not proven
- completed full-weight activation, named client workloads, recurring settlement/collateral volume, ordinary paid public-GS traffic, CC burn or externally sourced CC acquisition attributable to Marex.
Tier A · September–5 October 2026 verification · Monitoring
Canton Foundation CIPs repository, CIP-0126 status Approved — https://github.com/canton-foundation/cips
Verify CAN-MAREX-SUPER-VALIDATOR-01Accepted relationship history
· CAN-MAREX-SUPER-VALIDATOR-01 · Not in preceding Ledger → Scheduled / committed deployment
Maintenance accepted in Version 17; numerical state unchanged.
Lion Group Holding Ltd. (Nasdaq: LGHL)HYPEpublic-company HYPE treasury accumulationLive productionToken implication → inspect limitshard independent outside-funded HYPE acquisition and an additional public-company treasury-demand channel beyond Hyperliquid Strategies; still discretionary/reflexive rather than mandatory capture.HYPE-LION-GROUP-TREASURY-01 · expand to understand
Lion Group Holding Ltd. (Nasdaq: LGHL)
access / distribution · Capital & market access
HYPE · scope-specific stage: Live production
public-company HYPE treasury accumulation
Canonical participating scope: Lion Group Holding Ltd. (Nasdaq: LGHL)
Lion Group disclosed in an SEC-filed 6-K that it sold its entire SOL position and part of its BTC position on 29 September and used the proceeds to acquire approximately 38,102 additional HYPE. Following the reallocation it held approximately 232,900 HYPE, valued at about $20.1M at the company's reported price.
- System implication
- none directly.
- Public-token implication
- hard independent outside-funded HYPE acquisition and an additional public-company treasury-demand channel beyond Hyperliquid Strategies; still discretionary/reflexive rather than mandatory capture.
- What is not proven
- durable future purchase pace, contractual lockup, permanent retention, or that this treasury demand is caused by Hyperliquid protocol utility rather than discretionary investment conviction.
Tier A · 29–30 September 2026 · Active
Lion Group SEC Form 6-K / Exhibit 99.1, 30 Sep. 2026 — https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1806524/000121390026104925/ea0307175-6k_lion.htm
Verify HYPE-LION-GROUP-TREASURY-01Accepted relationship history
· HYPE-LION-GROUP-TREASURY-01 · Not in preceding Ledger → Live production
Maintenance accepted in Version 17; numerical state unchanged.
S&P Global Ratings / Sky ProtocolSKYindependent credit/capital/liquidity assessmentLive productionToken implication → inspect limitsmixed: stronger reserves/lower-risk assets reduce recapitalization risk, while weak capitalization and growing complex credit exposure can divert surplus from SKY acquisition/burn or raise contingent dilution risk.SKY-SP-RATING-01 · expand to understand
S&P Global Ratings / Sky Protocol
financial product / asset deployment · Credit & collateral
SKY · scope-specific stage: Live production
independent credit/capital/liquidity assessment
Canonical participating scope: S&P Global Ratings; Sky Protocol
S&P Global Ratings affirmed Sky Protocol at `B-` with a Stable outlook. S&P reported combined USDS/DAI supply of about $9.5B, Sky reserves of about $92M as of 17 September against a $150M target, roughly $4.92B of lower-risk USDC and tokenized-money-market-fund assets (~50% of USDS/DAI circulation), and approximately $1B of Prime-Agent OTC lending. S&P described risk-adjusted capitalization as moderately improved while still weak and highlighted governance/holder concentration and ecosystem complexity as rating weaknesses.
- System implication
- provides high-quality independent validation of both Sky's substantial operating scale and its improving-but-still-thin capital position as Prime activity expands.
- Public-token implication
- mixed: stronger reserves/lower-risk assets reduce recapitalization risk, while weak capitalization and growing complex credit exposure can divert surplus from SKY acquisition/burn or raise contingent dilution risk.
- What is not proven
- a default probability, extreme-tail loss ceiling, permanence of the asset mix or reserve trajectory, or that the `B-` rating maps directly to SKY-token value.
Tier A · 1 October 2026 · Active
S&P Global Ratings 1 Oct. 2026 — https://www.spglobal.com/ratings/en/regulatory/article/-/view/type/HTML/id/3637232
Verify SKY-SP-RATING-01Accepted relationship history
· SKY-SP-RATING-01 · Not in preceding Ledger → Live production
Maintenance accepted in Version 17; numerical state unchanged.
SMBC Nikko Securities / Nethermind / Uniswap Labs / Base / Nyx FoundationUNIregulated Japanese onchain trading gateway using Uniswap v4 hooksScheduled / committed deploymentToken implication → inspect limitsnone currently; token benefit requires future fee-bearing execution that reaches the TokenJar → Firepit → UNI-destruction chain.UNI-SMBC-NIKKO-DEFI-GATEWAY-01 · expand to understand
SMBC Nikko Securities / Nethermind / Uniswap Labs / Base / Nyx Foundation
access / distribution · Access & infrastructure
UNI · scope-specific stage: Scheduled / committed deployment
regulated Japanese onchain trading gateway using Uniswap v4 hooks
Canonical participating scope: SMBC Nikko Securities; Nethermind; Uniswap Labs; Base; Nyx Foundation
SMBC Nikko Securities and Nethermind are building a DeFi Gateway for Japanese investors on Uniswap v4, with Uniswap Labs, Base and Nyx Foundation supporting development. Planned pools use v4 hooks for AML/CFT and investor-protection controls, with intended liquidity spanning stablecoins, RWAs and other digital assets; AI-powered vaults/interfaces are also planned.
- System implication
- materially strengthens the institutional implementation path for Permissioned Pools by moving from generic technical capability to a named major Japanese securities-firm deployment program.
- Public-token implication
- none currently; token benefit requires future fee-bearing execution that reaches the TokenJar → Firepit → UNI-destruction chain.
- What is not proven
- completed launch, funded liquidity, live Japanese investors, recurring trading volume, protocol-fee generation, TokenJar inflows, external UNI acquisition or Firepit burn attributable to the gateway.
Tier B · 2 October 2026 · Monitoring
Uniswap Labs 2 Oct. 2026 — https://blog.uniswap.org/es-ES/smbc-nikko-and-nethermind-are-building-a-defi-gateway-for-japan-on-uniswap-v4
Verify UNI-SMBC-NIKKO-DEFI-GATEWAY-01Accepted relationship history
· UNI-SMBC-NIKKO-DEFI-GATEWAY-01 · Not in preceding Ledger → Scheduled / committed deployment
Maintenance accepted in Version 17; numerical state unchanged.
Nuvanté Technologies / Bank of England Synchronisation LabXLMstablecoin clearing / synchronized settlement against RTGS RT2Pilot / PoCToken implication → inspect limitsno production XLM-demand warrant beyond future conditional fee/reserve use.XLM-NUVANTE-BOE-RTGS-01 · expand to understand
Nuvanté Technologies / Bank of England Synchronisation Lab
network / infrastructure use · Payments & money
XLM · scope-specific stage: Pilot / PoC
stablecoin clearing / synchronized settlement against RTGS RT2
Canonical participating scope: Nuvanté Technologies; Bank of England Synchronisation Lab
Nuvanté developed a Stellar-based prototype for stablecoin clearing and tested it in the Bank of England Synchronisation Lab against the RTGS RT2 environment, covering stablecoin issuance/redemption plus stablecoin-to-stablecoin and stablecoin-to-fiat flows. This evidence was present in the controlling Stellar deep-research authority but had not been carried into the canonical Ledger register.
- System implication
- strengthens Stellar's institutional clearing/interoperability fit and central-bank-settlement-adjacent technical evidence, but remains prototype-stage.
- Public-token implication
- no production XLM-demand warrant beyond future conditional fee/reserve use.
- What is not proven
- Bank of England production adoption of Stellar, live commercial clearing volume, funded balances, recurring bank usage, or material XLM demand.
Tier B · August–3 September 2026 · Monitoring
Stellar Development Foundation 3 Sep. 2026 — https://stellar.org/press/nuvante-technologies-announces-stablecoin-clearing-prototype-built-on-stellar-network-integrated-to-bank-of-england-rtgs ; controlling Stellar audited report
Verify XLM-NUVANTE-BOE-RTGS-01Accepted relationship history
· XLM-NUVANTE-BOE-RTGS-01 · Not in preceding Ledger → Pilot / PoC
Maintenance accepted in Version 17; numerical state unchanged.
Wirex / Visa / Stellar Development FoundationXLMlive USDC/EURC card-payment settlement on StellarLive productionToken implication → inspect limitsmandatory XLM fees/reserves remain economically small; no proportional XLM demand can be inferred from Wirex user count or Visa reach.XLM-WIREX-VISA-STABLECOIN-SETTLEMENT-01 · expand to understand
Wirex / Visa / Stellar Development Foundation
network / infrastructure use · Payments & money
XLM · scope-specific stage: Live production
live USDC/EURC card-payment settlement on Stellar
Canonical participating scope: Wirex; Visa; Stellar Development Foundation
Wirex, a Visa principal member, launched live onchain settlement of Visa card-payment obligations using USDC and EURC on Stellar. Wirex's broader customer base exceeds 7 million users, but that user count is not a measure of active Stellar settlement users or Stellar transaction volume.
- System implication
- hard payments-production evidence linking a Visa principal member to direct stablecoin settlement on Stellar and strengthens the network's real-world payment-rail case.
- Public-token implication
- mandatory XLM fees/reserves remain economically small; no proportional XLM demand can be inferred from Wirex user count or Visa reach.
- What is not proven
- Stellar-specific settlement volume, share of Wirex/Visa obligations settled on Stellar, active-user penetration, exclusivity, or material XLM working-inventory demand.
Tier A · 18 November 2025 · Active
Wirex / Stellar release 18 Nov. 2025 — https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/wirex-and-stellar-go-live-with-dual-stablecoin-visa-settlement-in-usdc-and-eurc-for-7-million-users-302618287.html ; Stellar — https://stellar.org/press/wirex-and-stellar-go-live-with-dual-stablecoin-visa-settlement-in-usdc-and-eurc-for-7-million-users
Verify XLM-WIREX-VISA-STABLECOIN-SETTLEMENT-01Accepted relationship history
· XLM-WIREX-VISA-STABLECOIN-SETTLEMENT-01 · Not in preceding Ledger → Live production
Maintenance accepted in Version 17; numerical state unchanged.
AQAv2 / USDC / Circle / Coinbase / Hyperliquid Assistance FundHYPEreserve-yield routing to protocol/Assistance FundLive productionToken implication → inspect limitscreates a live non-trading-funded input to Assistance-Fund HYPE acquisition/burn economics; one payment does not yet establish a mature recurring second capture engine.HYPE-AQAV2-USDC-YIELD-01 · expand to understand
AQAv2 / USDC / Circle / Coinbase / Hyperliquid Assistance Fund
network / infrastructure use · Protocol economics
HYPE · scope-specific stage: Live production
reserve-yield routing to protocol/Assistance Fund
Canonical participating scope: AQAv2 / USDC; Circle; Coinbase; Hyperliquid Assistance Fund
under AQAv2, stablecoin deployers share approximately 90% of cost-adjusted reserve-yield revenue on Hyperliquid USDC supply with the protocol; yield began accruing on 26 August and Hyperliquid confirmed the first payment was made to the Assistance Fund on 3 October 2026. Circle is technical deployer and Coinbase is treasury deployer.
- System implication
- converts a planned aligned-stablecoin revenue stream into realized production economics and diversifies protocol revenue beyond trading fees.
- Public-token implication
- creates a live non-trading-funded input to Assistance-Fund HYPE acquisition/burn economics; one payment does not yet establish a mature recurring second capture engine.
- What is not proven
- the first payment amount, durable future USDC balances/yields, repeated payment magnitude, or the long-run contribution of AQAv2 relative to trading-fee-funded HYPE acquisition.
Tier A · 26 August–3 October 2026 · Active
Hyperliquid Announcements, confirmed 3 Oct. 2026 — https://t.me/s/hyperliquid_announcements/550
Verify HYPE-AQAV2-USDC-YIELD-01Accepted relationship history
· HYPE-AQAV2-USDC-YIELD-01 · Scheduled / committed deployment → Live production
Prior fact: approximately 90% of relevant cost-adjusted reserve-yield economics are designed to route to the protocol/AF.
Maintenance accepted in Version 17; numerical state unchanged.
Open Standard / Bridge / Coinbase / Mastercard / Shopify / Stripe / VisaSOLnative business stablecoin issuance, payments, settlement and treasury operationsLive productionToken implication → inspect limitsOUSD activity consumes backend SOL fees, but low execution costs and sponsorship mean no proportional SOL scarcity or persistent institutional SOL ownership is established.SOL-OPEN-USD-01 · expand to understand
Open Standard / Bridge / Coinbase / Mastercard / Shopify / Stripe / Visa
financial product / asset deployment · Payments & money
SOL · scope-specific stage: Live production
native business stablecoin issuance, payments, settlement and treasury operations
Canonical participating scope: Open Standard; Bridge; Coinbase; Mastercard; Shopify; Stripe; Visa
Open USD (OUSD) is live natively on Solana. Businesses can mint and burn 1:1 for dollars; Bridge issues the stablecoin; reserves are held through BlackRock, Lead Bank and BNY; Coinbase, Mastercard, Shopify, Stripe and Visa are founding partners; and the founding group has committed more than $1B to establish OUSD liquidity. Solana Foundation states more than 200 companies plan integrations.
- System implication
- materially strengthens Solana's institutional/business stablecoin distribution architecture and adds a native stablecoin with unusually strong founding-partner distribution and liquidity commitments.
- Public-token implication
- OUSD activity consumes backend SOL fees, but low execution costs and sponsorship mean no proportional SOL scarcity or persistent institutional SOL ownership is established.
- What is not proven
- that the full $1B commitment is already funded or circulating on Solana; current OUSD supply, settlement/payment volume, active institutional-user count, or material persistent SOL inventory created by OUSD.
Tier B · 30 September 2026 · Active
Solana Foundation 30 Sep. 2026 — https://solana.com/news/open-usd-is-live-on-solana
Verify SOL-OPEN-USD-01Accepted relationship history
· SOL-OPEN-USD-01 · Live production → Live production
Prior fact: Open USD supports Solana as part of business-led multichain stablecoin distribution.
Maintenance accepted in Version 17; numerical state unchanged.
Accepted relationship changes
Evidence maintenance accepted in Version 17. Score state remains frozen.
CC · Super Validator participation / institutional-market infrastructure commitmentNot in preceding Ledger → Scheduled / committed deploymentNew canonical evidenceHold — frozen Score Registry unchanged
Canton governance approved CIP-0126, titled “Marex Super Validator Weight 10,” formally adding a major global financial-services firm to the approved Super Validator pipeline.
- Analytical consequence
- strengthens high-quality institutional governance/operating commitment and Canton's distribution into capital-markets participants, but remains forward evidence until production activity is visible.
- Token consequence / boundary
- none directly; any CC impact depends on future paid public-GS traffic and marginal CC sourcing.
- What remains unproven / next verification boundary
- completed full-weight activation, named client workloads, recurring settlement/collateral volume, ordinary paid public-GS traffic, CC burn or externally sourced CC acquisition attributable to Marex.
- What did not change
- All canonical scores, warranted ranges, confidence, components, Profile and Archetype remain frozen. This is accepted evidence maintenance, not a published score or thesis change.
Accepted Version-17 maintenance · Ledger reconciliation date shown; original Evidence dates remain on the record.
HYPE · public-company HYPE treasury accumulationNot in preceding Ledger → Live productionNew canonical evidenceHold — frozen Score Registry unchanged
Lion Group disclosed in an SEC-filed 6-K that it sold its entire SOL position and part of its BTC position on 29 September and used the proceeds to acquire approximately 38,102 additional HYPE. Following the reallocation it held approximately 232,900 HYPE, valued at about $20.1M at the company's reported price.
- Analytical consequence
- none directly.
- Token consequence / boundary
- hard independent outside-funded HYPE acquisition and an additional public-company treasury-demand channel beyond Hyperliquid Strategies; still discretionary/reflexive rather than mandatory capture.
- What remains unproven / next verification boundary
- durable future purchase pace, contractual lockup, permanent retention, or that this treasury demand is caused by Hyperliquid protocol utility rather than discretionary investment conviction.
- What did not change
- All canonical scores, warranted ranges, confidence, components, Profile and Archetype remain frozen. This is accepted evidence maintenance, not a published score or thesis change.
Accepted Version-17 maintenance · Ledger reconciliation date shown; original Evidence dates remain on the record.
SKY · independent credit/capital/liquidity assessmentNot in preceding Ledger → Live productionNew canonical evidenceHold — frozen Score Registry unchanged
S&P Global Ratings affirmed Sky Protocol at `B-` with a Stable outlook. S&P reported combined USDS/DAI supply of about $9.5B, Sky reserves of about $92M as of 17 September against a $150M target, roughly $4.92B of lower-risk USDC and tokenized-money-market-fund assets (~50% of USDS/DAI circulation), and approximately $1B of Prime-Agent OTC lending. S&P described risk-adjusted capitalization as moderately improved while still weak and highlighted governance/holder concentration and ecosystem complexity as rating weaknesses.
- Analytical consequence
- provides high-quality independent validation of both Sky's substantial operating scale and its improving-but-still-thin capital position as Prime activity expands.
- Token consequence / boundary
- mixed: stronger reserves/lower-risk assets reduce recapitalization risk, while weak capitalization and growing complex credit exposure can divert surplus from SKY acquisition/burn or raise contingent dilution risk.
- What remains unproven / next verification boundary
- a default probability, extreme-tail loss ceiling, permanence of the asset mix or reserve trajectory, or that the `B-` rating maps directly to SKY-token value.
- What did not change
- All canonical scores, warranted ranges, confidence, components, Profile and Archetype remain frozen. This is accepted evidence maintenance, not a published score or thesis change.
Accepted Version-17 maintenance · Ledger reconciliation date shown; original Evidence dates remain on the record.
UNI · regulated Japanese onchain trading gateway using Uniswap v4 hooksNot in preceding Ledger → Scheduled / committed deploymentNew canonical evidenceHold — frozen Score Registry unchanged
SMBC Nikko Securities and Nethermind are building a DeFi Gateway for Japanese investors on Uniswap v4, with Uniswap Labs, Base and Nyx Foundation supporting development. Planned pools use v4 hooks for AML/CFT and investor-protection controls, with intended liquidity spanning stablecoins, RWAs and other digital assets; AI-powered vaults/interfaces are also planned.
- Analytical consequence
- materially strengthens the institutional implementation path for Permissioned Pools by moving from generic technical capability to a named major Japanese securities-firm deployment program.
- Token consequence / boundary
- none currently; token benefit requires future fee-bearing execution that reaches the TokenJar → Firepit → UNI-destruction chain.
- What remains unproven / next verification boundary
- completed launch, funded liquidity, live Japanese investors, recurring trading volume, protocol-fee generation, TokenJar inflows, external UNI acquisition or Firepit burn attributable to the gateway.
- What did not change
- All canonical scores, warranted ranges, confidence, components, Profile and Archetype remain frozen. This is accepted evidence maintenance, not a published score or thesis change.
Accepted Version-17 maintenance · Ledger reconciliation date shown; original Evidence dates remain on the record.
XLM · stablecoin clearing / synchronized settlement against RTGS RT2Not in preceding Ledger → Pilot / PoCNew canonical evidenceHold — frozen Score Registry unchanged
Nuvanté developed a Stellar-based prototype for stablecoin clearing and tested it in the Bank of England Synchronisation Lab against the RTGS RT2 environment, covering stablecoin issuance/redemption plus stablecoin-to-stablecoin and stablecoin-to-fiat flows. This evidence was present in the controlling Stellar deep-research authority but had not been carried into the canonical Ledger register.
- Analytical consequence
- strengthens Stellar's institutional clearing/interoperability fit and central-bank-settlement-adjacent technical evidence, but remains prototype-stage.
- Token consequence / boundary
- no production XLM-demand warrant beyond future conditional fee/reserve use.
- What remains unproven / next verification boundary
- Bank of England production adoption of Stellar, live commercial clearing volume, funded balances, recurring bank usage, or material XLM demand.
- What did not change
- All canonical scores, warranted ranges, confidence, components, Profile and Archetype remain frozen. This is accepted evidence maintenance, not a published score or thesis change.
Accepted Version-17 maintenance · Ledger reconciliation date shown; original Evidence dates remain on the record.
XLM · live USDC/EURC card-payment settlement on StellarNot in preceding Ledger → Live productionNew canonical evidenceHold — frozen Score Registry unchanged
Wirex, a Visa principal member, launched live onchain settlement of Visa card-payment obligations using USDC and EURC on Stellar. Wirex's broader customer base exceeds 7 million users, but that user count is not a measure of active Stellar settlement users or Stellar transaction volume.
- Analytical consequence
- hard payments-production evidence linking a Visa principal member to direct stablecoin settlement on Stellar and strengthens the network's real-world payment-rail case.
- Token consequence / boundary
- mandatory XLM fees/reserves remain economically small; no proportional XLM demand can be inferred from Wirex user count or Visa reach.
- What remains unproven / next verification boundary
- Stellar-specific settlement volume, share of Wirex/Visa obligations settled on Stellar, active-user penetration, exclusivity, or material XLM working-inventory demand.
- What did not change
- All canonical scores, warranted ranges, confidence, components, Profile and Archetype remain frozen. This is accepted evidence maintenance, not a published score or thesis change.
Accepted Version-17 maintenance · Ledger reconciliation date shown; original Evidence dates remain on the record.
HYPE · reserve-yield routing to protocol/Assistance FundScheduled / committed deployment → Live productionStage / fact advancementHold — frozen Score Registry unchanged
under AQAv2, stablecoin deployers share approximately 90% of cost-adjusted reserve-yield revenue on Hyperliquid USDC supply with the protocol; yield began accruing on 26 August and Hyperliquid confirmed the first payment was made to the Assistance Fund on 3 October 2026. Circle is technical deployer and Coinbase is treasury deployer.
Previously recorded: approximately 90% of relevant cost-adjusted reserve-yield economics are designed to route to the protocol/AF.
- Analytical consequence
- converts a planned aligned-stablecoin revenue stream into realized production economics and diversifies protocol revenue beyond trading fees.
- Token consequence / boundary
- creates a live non-trading-funded input to Assistance-Fund HYPE acquisition/burn economics; one payment does not yet establish a mature recurring second capture engine.
- What remains unproven / next verification boundary
- the first payment amount, durable future USDC balances/yields, repeated payment magnitude, or the long-run contribution of AQAv2 relative to trading-fee-funded HYPE acquisition.
- What did not change
- All canonical scores, warranted ranges, confidence, components, Profile and Archetype remain frozen. This is accepted evidence maintenance, not a published score or thesis change.
Accepted Version-17 maintenance · Ledger reconciliation date shown; original Evidence dates remain on the record.
SOL · native business stablecoin issuance, payments, settlement and treasury operationsLive production → Live production (fact update; stage unchanged)Stage / fact advancementHold — frozen Score Registry unchanged
Open USD (OUSD) is live natively on Solana. Businesses can mint and burn 1:1 for dollars; Bridge issues the stablecoin; reserves are held through BlackRock, Lead Bank and BNY; Coinbase, Mastercard, Shopify, Stripe and Visa are founding partners; and the founding group has committed more than $1B to establish OUSD liquidity. Solana Foundation states more than 200 companies plan integrations.
Previously recorded: Open USD supports Solana as part of business-led multichain stablecoin distribution.
- Analytical consequence
- materially strengthens Solana's institutional/business stablecoin distribution architecture and adds a native stablecoin with unusually strong founding-partner distribution and liquidity commitments.
- Token consequence / boundary
- OUSD activity consumes backend SOL fees, but low execution costs and sponsorship mean no proportional SOL scarcity or persistent institutional SOL ownership is established.
- What remains unproven / next verification boundary
- that the full $1B commitment is already funded or circulating on Solana; current OUSD supply, settlement/payment volume, active institutional-user count, or material persistent SOL inventory created by OUSD.
- What did not change
- All canonical scores, warranted ranges, confidence, components, Profile and Archetype remain frozen. This is accepted evidence maintenance, not a published score or thesis change.
Accepted Version-17 maintenance · Ledger reconciliation date shown; original Evidence dates remain on the record.